Benson
|
2008-09-10
, 18:48
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#81
|
|
2008-09-10
, 20:43
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#82
|
but for that we need to toss the current way for the browser to id itself to the server, and rather have something where the browser can specifically tell the server what features it can or cant support.
|
2008-09-10
, 20:48
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#83
|
|
2008-09-10
, 20:54
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#84
|
you mean like the "accepts" header all browsers support? the feature exists, it just needs to be used. But more importantly, it needs to be gracefully backwards compatible, amongst countless different browsers
|
2008-09-10
, 21:05
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#85
|
|
2008-09-10
, 21:31
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#86
|
...hell, facebook wont allow the microb browser to access as it cant tell if its firefox, IE, safari or opera (and maybe lately chrome).
|
2008-09-10
, 21:55
|
Posts: 223 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ home
|
#87
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jzencovich For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-09-10
, 22:27
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#88
|
I've not had these issues... FB works just fine in MicroB on my N810.
-T.
|
2008-09-10
, 22:35
|
|
Posts: 868 |
Thanked: 474 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Capital District, NY, USA
|
#89
|
yes, because accepts has never provided much "real world" useful information, everyone builds their own information based on the user-agent.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to brontide For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-09-10
, 23:36
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#90
|