Reply
Thread Tools
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#71
All Florida residents, you have 10 minutes remaining to be disenfranchised. Hurry!
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#72
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Part of what's happening with Nokia picking up the Maemo trademark for use directly by the company is that maemo.org is moving away from direct Nokia control and more into community hands.

So, of course Nokia isn't completely uninvolved in maemo.org (they do pay for and run the servers ), but maemo.org is moving into community hands.
Well, duh.

I was quibbling with the word "nothing". Leave me to my pedanticism, ya numbnut (I think I just invented a word).
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#73
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I was quibbling with the word "nothing". Leave me to my pedanticism, ya numbnut (I think I just invented a word).
Clearly not.

By the way, the unofficial results are in. We're just waiting on dneary to call it now.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#74
Obviously I need to update Firefox's inadequate dictionary.

Can't wait for the vote results!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#75
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Can't wait for the vote results!
Well, they're definitely available. Just go back to the same place you voted.
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#76
People from the various campaigns are coming around to take the lawn signs back, right? Or do we take 'em down and return them to the campaign offices?
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#77
Originally Posted by qole View Post
People from the various campaigns are coming around to take the lawn signs back, right? Or do we take 'em down and return them to the campaign offices?
No no no... you run around switching them to different yards. O, the fun we'll have.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#78
I wonder what this means: "This member chose to vote for none of the possible choices."

Is that someone who went into the voting booth and marked "none of the above"?

Is that a hanging chad?
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#79
Originally Posted by qole View Post
Is that a hanging chad?
No, but it should be a hanging offense.

ba-da-bish!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#80
Originally Posted by qole View Post
I wonder what this means: "This member chose to vote for none of the possible choices."

Is that someone who went into the voting booth and marked "none of the above"?

Is that a hanging chad?
First of all, it does not mean the same as not voting.

It means the voter took the time to vote and express that he/she did not wish to vote for anyone of the above.

Like with all other options the reason for this vote isn't stated although there are theories on why someomne would vote for such option. In some (feedback related) polls it is possible to state such ie. "None of the above (please specify)."

Although I don't know how this is called in English, in my language its 'blanco stem' which translates to 'white vote' or 'blank vote'. AFAIK it is a normal option in a voting process...

Reasons for voting blanco often include to express disagreement with voting process.

Reasons to express disagreement include (taken from Wikipedia NL):

* The provided statement to vote on is explainable in various ways and therefore has to be redefined.
* The voting procedure is vague.
* Those who proposed the vote haven't fully informed the eligable voters, or have done so unclearly.
* Disagreement with ability to vote. For example, to express disagreement for specific reason to vote such as in case of referedum, or to express disagreement with the democratic voting system, or democracy in general.
* Voter does not agree with any of the options.

There are several differences between a blank vote and not casting a vote. Reasons not to vote (taken from Wikipedia NL) include

* Voter is neutral to outcome.
* Voter is indifferent about outcome, cannot decide, has not looked into the subject.
* Voter is not interested in subject to be voted about.
* Voter is not for the proposal, but has a veto and with voting against the proposal would be rejected (this happens in the Security Council, where permanent members have the right to veto).

In general, by voting blank you express that you are involved (interested) in the democratic system while by not voting you express that you aren't.

Some people want everyone to vote so the percentage of voters is higher. They only do this to justify the voting process. A person who does not wish to vote, for example because he/she hasn't looked into the particular issue, has their right to do so. They could make an uninformed vote by force because they feel they have to decide based on pression from others, but this is not a sincere casted vote.

Because I don't agree with a Plurality model I always vote blank when able to.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:58.