Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#11
Originally Posted by benny1967 View Post
As for the N810 being step 3: It's very strange; remember when Nokia said the N810 was a sideline rather than the next generation after the N800? So they're not only counting the steps forward, there also counting when they step aside.
Hardware-wise the N810 isn't very different from the N800. If you take raw resources, it has the same CPU, while the N800 is faster than the 770. The N800 and N810 serve different purposes, and are somewhat complimentary. The 'N900' with OMAP3 won't be such a 'side step'.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!

Last edited by allnameswereout; 2008-09-16 at 23:17. Reason: the Great Leader forces me to correct my post
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#12
I would't be very surprised if Nokia decided for continuation of current policy with N900 (simplier version without keyboard) and N910 (full experience ). In this way N900 would be step 3 and N910 step 3.5 .
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#13
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
I would't be very surprised if Nokia decided for continuation of current policy with N900 (simplier version without keyboard) and N910 (full experience ). In this way N900 would be step 3 and N910 step 3.5 .
3G and 3.5G?
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#14
Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
I don't think the N810 wimax edition was the step 4, actually.
No thinking about it, Quim has confirmed that the N810W is not step 4.

Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
Hardware-wise the N810 isn't very different from the N800. If you take raw resources, it has the same CPU, while the N800 is faster than the N770. The N800 and N810 serve different purposes, and are somewhat complimentary. The 'N900' with OMAP3 won't be such a 'side step'.
There's no such thing as an "N770".
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#15
There is if you'd like to evade using trademarks
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#16
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
There is if you'd like to evade using trademarks
and "N800", "N810", and "OMAP3" are what, exactly?
__________________
Ryan Abel

Last edited by GeneralAntilles; 2008-09-16 at 18:30.
 
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#17
.... speaking of trademarks: "Step" seems to be the trademark Nokia should register now that everyone is referring to the models as "Steps". Marketing-wise, even a sidestep is better than an nit.

And anyway: Even if some of the steps are smaller than expected (N800/N810): Who says the plan ends at #5? The Grand Unified Gadget I had hoped for could still be, say, step 8 or 9.
 
eliagp's Avatar
Posts: 301 | Thanked: 71 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Santiago, Chile
#18
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
It's been well communicated within our walls.



In this sense it was not meant as a direct replacement, which many assumed.

But sidestepping... eh, I won't go there.
maybe a diagonal step? XD
 

The Following User Says Thank You to eliagp For This Useful Post:
Posts: 566 | Thanked: 150 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#19
Step 5 will be The Great Leap Forward.

Last edited by iamthewalrus; 2008-09-16 at 21:49.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to iamthewalrus For This Useful Post:
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#20
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
and "N800", "N810", and "OMAP3" are what, exactly?
Yeah, N800 and N810 aren't trademarks, and OMAP3 isn't a trademark by Nokia. But it sounds better in the line, too.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:07.