Reply
Thread Tools
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#321
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
I call BS. My bet's on Q1 2009.
Well, they told us straight out that the beta SDK won't be released until March 2009. Would they really release a new piece of hardware at the same time as the beta SDK?
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#322
Originally Posted by qole View Post
I was expecting Igor to show up...
He was there. I watched him give his part of a presentation. I believe you were sitting in on the multimedia presentation at the time.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#323
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
He was there. I watched him give his part of a presentation. I believe you were sitting in on the multimedia presentation at the time.
You're kidding. Oh well. He didn't have any hardware to show, did he?

And I might have been in the front room chatting with developers, too. It seemed like there was someone there who could answer any of my questions. Not all the same person, of course. But wow.

Off topic a bit here, but...

It was fun to be at c-base, and look at my link-local list of contacts and see the name "rob taylor" show up. "Please wave your hand," I type, and this guy at a nearby table looks around and starts waving. I'm surprised, of course, because he's using an IBM laptop, not the usual Mac laptop that most link local users have. "How come you're on link local?" I ask, and he says, "Oh I'm the guy behind the telepathy suite; I'm running Empathy on my laptop."

I hope the collabora guys get Bonjour / link-local fixed for Diablo. It is very cool.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#324
Originally Posted by dafrabbit View Post
I'm not quite sure about this...I know on old pen-input touchscreens, special styluses were needed for the screen to register the input...but if it registers touch? Dunno.

What type of touchscreen is on the ITs currently?
Resistive, "normal" touchscreen only; this senses pressure (actually closer to force).

I have an HP tx2000; it has a dual-tech screen with a resistive touchscreen (fingers and plain stylii) and a Wacom digitizer with a passive (but special) stylus. The stylus takes no batteries, but distinguishes tip vs. eraser, has pressure sensitivity, a side button, and moves the cursor around when hovering up to ~0.5" over the screen. (Also, when it's within this range, the computer ignores input from the touchscreen, allowing you to rest your hand on the screen while writing. There's no reason I know why a capacitive multi-touch sensor can't be similarly combined with a digitizer, though I'd bet the digitizer uses substantial power.

I'd really like to see such a dual screen in the N9xx, with the digitizer shut down by a switch in the silo.


As for what multi-touch is good for anyway... finger-tracking!

When you're using one finger (or stylus) on the display, touching it with another finger doesn't have to drag the pointer over to the centroid, but can keep it with the present finger. This could also make two-thumb on-screen keyboarding go a lot faster, as you wouldn't have to guarantee you lift before your other thumb hits. To say nothing of Pyano.

Even if you only use one cursor, and no gestures, a good finger-tracking (and switching, when appropriate) algorithm can make a multi-touch display a lot less glitchy. I'd be thrilled to see this much, although gestures and such are cool, too...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#325
The problem with "cool" things is you get tired of them very quickly (as other things are becoming "cool"). Better stay with technologies that aren't the cool stuff du jour but will remain useful tomorrow.
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#326
thats what i see when i see multi-touch, not those demo friendly gestures, but being able to control multiple things on the screen at the same time. or have a shift key in software.

hell, give me bomberman with multi-touch

who needs hardware gamepads
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#327
Originally Posted by tso View Post
thats what i see when i see multi-touch, not those demo friendly gestures, but being able to control multiple things on the screen at the same time.
i cant even do this in my brain, why would i want to do it on a screen?
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#328
Originally Posted by benny1967 View Post
i cant even do this in my brain, why would i want to do it on a screen?
Ah, you poor souls without ADHD.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 477 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Munich, Germany
#329
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
you could start a specific entry called $NAME/Germany.
This is what I did, isn't it?


Its a combination of factors, perhaps also a whole new platform (Maemo, Hildon) and the fact Nokia dabbled into this market. The Sharp Zaurus also provided internet connectivity, and ran Linux. One of my beefs with the Zaurus was that the WWW browsing was severely cluttered, so usability might also be an argument for 770.
The Zaurus was also a new platform (QT). The Zaurus had an adequate browser at the times. Opera and even Netfront worked fairly well. Flash was not a big thing at the time.
I still have a few zauruses (zaurii?). The main problem is that they do not support wpa (I know they can with a different wifi card) or bluetooth (and yes: I have an adapter).

Still: I see the 770 as the only successor to the Zaurus. Sharp tried to bring a linux palmtop to the market, and quickly backed out (I had to import the second one from Japan). Nokia started where they left.


Oh, don't be sarcastic. Many people don't even read them. They just sign a contract without knowing what they sign. I once had a bank trying to pull me into this trick, and I told them to go **** themselves. And, to give another example: whenever I got hired, I first read the contract.
It's my job to read legal stuff and spot the errors and I like being sarcastic.


Its a cat and mouse game which, if telcos want to win, means many people will lose. Ie. ban of cryptographic protocols, or only allow specific protocols.
The masses are losing already. Telcos make their main profits from sms, ringtones and premium services. The telcos are only interested in keeping this situation running. They don't care if 10 linux geeks find a way to run voip as long as the masses keep buying pre-configured branded phones.

You seem to forget that it is a number game. The telcos don't care about anything as long as it is not conveniently packaged in a preconfigured phone. Then they get nasty.

For the future N900, this means that it will not be designed to be a voip over hsdpa only device. Nokia knows how nasty the telcos can be, telcos are their main customers. Of course, it could be that Nokia decides for a frontal attack, but I seriously doubt that. Still: they went for a frontal attack with music sales, so maybe I will be surprised...
 
Posts: 477 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Munich, Germany
#330
Originally Posted by qole View Post
My feeling is that when mobile providers, currently still thinking of themselves as mobile phone providers (oh woe to you, you fools) are reduced to ISPs, they will be caught in the same situation that current ISPs are caught in; if you try to restrict protocols or bandwidth, people just go to somewhere else that provides better service.

The mobile ISPs won't be able sell these stupid voice / text / data bundles anymore, because they won't be the only provider of the voice / text services anymore. Anyone will be able to download Skype or some generic SIP client for voice, and Pidgin or some other IM client for text.

What will they be left with?

Well, they can still provide the pipes, and compete in that arena. Woe, woe to them, because that arena is bloody and dangerous, and few emerge unscathed. The shakedown will leave the market a different place.

As I pointed out, the mobile network providers already have taken steps to prevent that from happening.
 
Reply

Tags
job, n900


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:28.