Seamless Software Upgrade v4.2008.36-5 is out! - Page 25 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (9)
to SailfishOS by biketool - 12 hrs, 19 mins ago
[Announce] coderus unrestricted system-ui (297)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by nieldk - 6 days, 17 hrs ago
more...

Page 25 of 54

Thread Tools

	allnameswereout	2008-09-30 , 14:38
	Posts: 3,397 \| Thanked: 1,212 times \| Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands	#241

Originally Posted by Linear2202

Had no problems with the update, nothing special done to my tablet though. Still getting browser unsupported messages which is disappointing.

Where do you get browser unsupported messages?

__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!

The Following User Says Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post:
ARJWright

attila77	2008-09-30 , 14:40
Posts: 3,319 \| Thanked: 5,610 times \| Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland	#242

Originally Posted by Picklesworth

Some poking in the terminal told me that the package was broken. pre-installed-documentation-rx44 was not the latest version, causing dpkg to spew an error prematurely.
Again, curse that preinstalled documentation!

Okay, results of a quick look - the official repos seem to have evaporated from my sources.list. Putting them back by hand (nothing to loose by now) does not solve the issue as even though it DOES find the proper pre-installed-documentation-rx44 version in the repo if you try to apt-get it, it fails with a 401 error. I probably managed to mess up my sources (I do have a fair amount of custom repos) but it's still pretty uncommon for the apt-get update to succeed in finding a package and then and the install not to be able do download the package in question because of a 401... (unauthorized access)

	tso	2008-09-30 , 14:43
	Posts: 4,783 \| Thanked: 1,253 times \| Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway	#243

Originally Posted by cecil

In limited testing the only thing 36-5 appears to have broken is Camera. It works, but popping it out no longer starts internet chat and it doesn't auto-rotate anymore.

works for me, the freakin thing even makes the im system attempt to log on to check what contacts are online...

and this even as i can no longer log on to msn using it...

hrmf, seems that my msn issue is unrelated to the latest SSU, its more a issue of one to many libpurple versions floating around, some with very weird dependencies...

Last edited by tso; 2008-09-30 at 15:09.

Howie_it	2008-09-30 , 14:50
Posts: 19 \| Thanked: 1 time \| Joined on Feb 2008 @ Canada	#244

Had problem last time and the camera was broken.
Updated last night everything went smoothly even the camera is working correctly now.

lm2	2008-09-30 , 15:10
Posts: 609 \| Thanked: 232 times \| Joined on Dec 2007 @ the end of my rope	#245

Originally Posted by possessedskier

So I assume the SD is really running the new version???
Why didn't it update the SD version # until after I upgraded the flash version?
Why didn't the upgrade ever show up in the Application Manager when booted to SD?

I have a similar problem, although I have no idea where to go from here. The ssu showed in flash, and I updated that first. Then when booting from SD, control panel showed new version. But everyone here said that I didn't *really* have new version, and had to update SD too. But no ssu update is showing in SD. And "apt-get upgrade" and "apt-get update" seem to do nothing.

I reflashed device with older diablo, and replaced SD image with image from last week. And still no ssu in SD.

Is there a way to install current ssu from command line????

Thanks.

UPDATE

Last edited by lm2; 2008-09-30 at 16:39.

	Karel Jansens	2008-09-30 , 15:19
	Posts: 3,220 \| Thanked: 326 times \| Joined on Oct 2005 @ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)	#246

Let me try again, one last time: Has anyone tried this upgrade from a NIT with firmware version 4.2008.23-14? By that I mean: Tried to apply the latest upgrade without first going through the previous one (in my case because that upgrade never got installed and refuses to re-install). Interestingly, upgrade v4.2008.36-5 does show up in the update section of my Application Mangler, although I don' seem to get the exclamation mark.

I do NOT want to flash.

__________________
Watch out Nokia, Pandora's box has opened (sorta)...
I do love explaining cryptic sigs, but for the impatient: http://www.openpandora.org/

	sachin007	2008-09-30 , 15:21
	Posts: 2,041 \| Thanked: 1,066 times \| Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston	#247

will this work for N810 internal memory boot;

1. update internal memory
2. update flash
3. install boot menu deb.

After this can i boot with updated os from internal memory?

The Following User Says Thank You to sachin007 For This Useful Post:
tubby17

	tso	2008-09-30 , 15:23
	Posts: 4,783 \| Thanked: 1,253 times \| Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway	#248

Originally Posted by Karel Jansens

Let me try again, one last time: Has anyone tried this upgrade from a NIT with firmware version 4.2008.23-14? By that I mean: Tried to apply the latest upgrade without first going through the previous one (in my case because that upgrade never got installed and refuses to re-install). Interestingly, upgrade v4.2008.36-5 does show up in the update section of my Application Mangler, although I don' seem to get the exclamation mark.

I do NOT want to flash.

my guess, just about everyone that didnt get a proper update the last time ended up going with a reflash, so your on your own...

Peet	2008-09-30 , 15:26
Posts: 302 \| Thanked: 254 times \| Joined on Oct 2007	#249

Originally Posted by Texrat

Some people want early releases, but then they want to flame Nokia over issues with those releases rather than contribute productively toward resolutions. Damned if we do, damned if we don't. You don't want any more of my opinion on that subject.

Frankly I haven't seen much flaming here and even then, some moaning is inevitable where human beings and some inconvenience are concerned.

In any case I was merely suggesting a way of potentially reducing the inconvenience (of a failed update) that leads to the dreaded flaming and moaning.

Why would anyone have a problem with the SSU being first available via development repos? Maemo (Nokia) might even gain some valuable and informative feedback from that crowd before unleashing the update upon the ordinary users.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peet For This Useful Post:
mwiktowy, vinc17

	Karel Jansens	2008-09-30 , 15:43
	Posts: 3,220 \| Thanked: 326 times \| Joined on Oct 2005 @ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)	#250

Originally Posted by tso