Active Topics
|
2008-12-07
, 19:15
|
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Maryland
|
#12
|
Originally Posted by allnameswereout
What are you quoting? Can I see the source?
Whatever speeds their network can reach internally doesn't matter for the definition either. What matters is what customers interact with (with eventual bottlenecks).
Last edited by Andyschism; 2008-12-07 at 19:19.
 |
|
2008-12-07
, 21:02
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#13
|
Same source as before, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
|
|
2008-12-07
, 21:42
|
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Maryland
|
#14
|
Thank you. So what technologies are out that meet the defined 4G status?
 |
|
2008-12-07
, 22:09
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#15
|
Wow, a battle of conflicting Wikipedia pages. What the world has come to ...
|
|
2008-12-07
, 22:35
|
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Maryland
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by mullf
This is how all wars will be in the future. Armys of editing robots will brace themselfs against legions of revision droids in a battle that even the gods would be envious of.
Wow, a battle of conflicting Wikipedia pages. What the world has come to ...
 |
|
2008-12-07
, 23:00
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#17
|
lets just hope they dont feel like editing out humanity...
|
|
2008-12-07
, 23:28
|
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Maryland
|
#18
|
Dont worry its just a thought.
Last edited by Andyschism; 2008-12-07 at 23:29. Reason: Did not meet the standards set by Revision Droid Army code of 2315
Last edited by Andyschism; 2008-12-07 at 23:29. Reason: Did not meet the standards set by Revision Droid Army code of 2315
 |
|
2008-12-09
, 22:20
|
|
Posts: 239 |
Thanked: 53 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Massachusetts
|
#19
|
Perhaps they'll be able to post their battles in the corrrect forum.
__________________
.
.
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
|
|
2009-01-14
, 19:57
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by Andyschism
You're welcome. AFAIK, none. LTE will.
Thank you. So what technologies are out that meet the defined 4G status?
ITU defines these standards. According to them, EDGE is 3G. WiMAX too. Well, if you compare them with each other. Or HSPA+ with EDGE. WiMAX delivers good speeds (better than current HSDPA/HSUPA), and is all-ip.
So while ITU uses strict guidelines for these definitions it doesn't mean everything. Calling WiMAX 4G is wrong though. Some call the 'better'/'newer' 3G standards like HSDPA/HSUPA/HSPA+ 3.5G, and call EDGE 2.5G or 2.75G. Also confusing, but in a way descriptive.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 |
| Tags |
| cdma, clear, sprint, wimax, xohm |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:44.
Still not convinced? Don't think anymore. Read the last bold line. WiMAX won't even reach the minimum requirement of 100 mbit. Therefore, according to ITU it doesn't fullfill to be qualified as 4G. Whatever speeds their network can reach internally doesn't matter for the definition either. What matters is what customers interact with (with eventual bottlenecks).
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!