![]() |
2009-01-27
, 04:02
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ California
|
#31
|
![]() |
2009-01-27
, 05:44
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#32
|
![]() |
2009-01-27
, 06:47
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#33
|
![]() |
2009-01-27
, 06:50
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#34
|
Which is what early MacOS and Windows proponents used to say before they had true pre-emptive multi-tasking.
Once Windows had it, they raved about it like it was their innovation. With the Mac, they at least acknowledged they had inherited it from their new unix core. But either way, it went from "not necessary" to "proof that they're on a modern OS, and how could any platform do without it?"
![]() |
2009-01-27
, 07:09
|
Posts: 1,213 |
Thanked: 356 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ California and Virginia
|
#35
|
![]() |
2009-01-27
, 16:01
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#36
|
Come to think of it, why don't the use the same hardware for maemo and s60 devices, it would cut development time wouldn't it? It would also mean we'd get a phone in our internet tablets!