Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 397 | Thanked: 227 times | Joined on May 2007
#1


so far it's only this:
Originally Posted by fanoush View Post
No, looks like numeric keypad. I wonder if this is additional one or the only one that the device has.

Code:
+static int rx71_keymap[] = {
+       /* Col, Row, Key */
+
+       KEY(0, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(0, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(0, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(0, 3, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(0, 4, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(0, 5, KEY_M),
+       KEY(0, 6, KEY_KPMINUS),
+       KEY(0, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(1, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(1, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(1, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(1, 3, KEY_KPPLUS),
+       KEY(1, 4, KEY_DELETE),
+       KEY(1, 5, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(1, 6, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(1, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(2, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(2, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(2, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(2, 3, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(2, 4, KEY_5),
+       KEY(2, 5, KEY_9),
+       KEY(2, 6, KEY_KPASTERISK),
+       KEY(2, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(3, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(3, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(3, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(3, 3, KEY_6),
+       KEY(3, 4, KEY_7),
+       KEY(3, 5, KEY_0),
+       KEY(3, 6, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(3, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(4, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(4, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(4, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(4, 3, KEY_8),
+       KEY(4, 4, KEY_ENTER),
+       KEY(4, 5, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(4, 6, KEY_4),
+       KEY(4, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(5, 0, KEY_BACKSPACE),
+       KEY(5, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(5, 2, KEY_F2),
+       KEY(5, 3, KEY_F3),
+       KEY(5, 4, KEY_F5),
+       KEY(5, 5, KEY_F4),
+       KEY(5, 6, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(5, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(6, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 3, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 4, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 5, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 6, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(6, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+
+       KEY(7, 0, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 1, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 2, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 3, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 4, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 5, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 6, KEY_RESERVED),
+       KEY(7, 7, KEY_RESERVED),
+};
 
pycage's Avatar
Posts: 3,404 | Thanked: 4,474 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ Germany
#2
The keycodes look to me as if this was a mobile phone keypad.

M -
+ DEL
5 9 *
6 7 0
8 ENTER 4
BACK F2 F3 F5 F4

Well, half a phone keypad...
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#3
Originally Posted by pycage View Post
The keycodes look to me as if this was a mobile phone keypad.
I think it is going to be a desktop calculator. =)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post:
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#4
a base 7 (offset 3) calculator!


gimme gimme gimme!
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post:
pycage's Avatar
Posts: 3,404 | Thanked: 4,474 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ Germany
#5
A calculator that cannot divide!
 
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#6
how do we expect to conquer then?
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#7
Originally Posted by pycage View Post
The keycodes look to me as if this was a mobile phone keypad.

M -
+ DEL
5 9 *
6 7 0
8 ENTER 4
BACK F2 F3 F5 F4

Well, half a phone keypad...
Even if I stick to row-columns as described in the code it doesn't make any sense:

Code:
[     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [  <  ] [     ] [     ] 
[     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] 
[     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [  F2 ] [     ] [     ] 
[     ] [  +  ] [     ] [  6  ] [  8  ] [  F3 ] [     ] [     ] 
[     ] [ <<  ] [  5  ] [  7  ] [ <-| ] [  F5 ] [     ] [     ] 
[  M  ] [     ] [  9  ] [  0  ] [     ] [  F4 ] [     ] [     ] 
[  -  ] [     ] [  *  ] [     ] [  4  ] [     ] [     ] [     ] 
[     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ] [     ]
somebody must be laughing at us right now

(Or maybe you need diamond-shaped keys for this layout )
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 631 | Thanked: 1,123 times | Joined on Sep 2005 @ Helsinki
#8
It's a riddle, like in Lost!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ragnar For This Useful Post:
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#9
I'm thinking if you saw the keyboard once, you'd slap yourself in the forehead and say "Oh, of course you'd wire that key layout into that matrix." The inverse problem, unfortunately, is not so simple... (Naturally, a staggered key layout is a definite possibility.)

And is it just me, or does "M" seem really odd?

Now, I'm stuck wondering whether I should go obtain and watch all Lost episodes, looking for a puzzle like that. On one hand, the probability that ragnar was dropping an obscure referential hint is miniscule. On the other hand, the geek glory and fame (within the IT community, anyway) to be gained if one does decipher such a hint defies mathematical analysis... (No, actually it doesn't; mathematical analysis conquers all, and indicates that someone who's watched Lost would beat me anyway, were there aught to be found.)
 
Posts: 397 | Thanked: 227 times | Joined on May 2007
#10
I remember that Lost episode! Trust me, the "M" is just where it should be!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ColdFusion For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
fremantle, rx-71


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:17.