Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#41
Originally Posted by EIPI View Post
in increasing order of seniority:

widget
app
killer app
Command Line
Kernel
Dang! I like that.

Lieutenant Kernel would work too.
 
Posts: 1,213 | Thanked: 356 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ California and Virginia
#42
Really, when you have trolled these forms for long enough, you know who are the senior members.

What we need is some admins and mods to help out!
__________________
----------------------------------------------------

www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#43
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
I think it's all pretty unnecessary. I don't use labels to help me decide who to trust.
Yes, that's exactly the point. The labels aren't useful for anything but fun, that's why I'm proposing changing them.

Either way, the apathy line isn't behind the "Post Reply" button. . . .

Originally Posted by Thesandlord View Post
What we need is some admins and mods to help out!
Please see the Talk announcement.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#44
Perhaps, since a high post count here likely indicates some dedication to miniature computing devices, we should turn the normal forum title progression style on its head. We could have people labeled with increasingly small/less significant titles as their post counts grow. It should be clear no one should take the veterans too seriously if they're all "dust motes", "pocket lint", or whatnot.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#45
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Perhaps, since a high post count here likely indicates some dedication to miniature computing devices, we should turn the normal forum title progression style on its head. We could have people labeled with increasingly small/less significant titles as their post counts grow. It should be clear no one should take the veterans too seriously if they're all "dust motes", "pocket lint", or whatnot.
I like this idea. I also like the idea of foreign (to most) words to inject some humour, but Finnish words could help propagate the meme that Nokia is "taking over" ITT into the maemo.org behemoth.

Personally, I'm most siding with the ideas of dropping it altogether, and having the post headings based on the pervasive maemo.org user header.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#46
I regard categories based on post count as being redundant of post count (we can easily see who has >100, etc).

I would rather have some useful descriptive information. Possibly, self-selection of a category reflective of the user's interest in Maemo - "app developer", "user", "just visiting", "tablet devotee", etc.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post:
timsamoff's Avatar
Posts: 1,605 | Thanked: 1,601 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Southern California
#47
I say we track user agents an grant higher levels to those who post here via their tablets -- anyone who has the patience to do that should be rewarded.

Tim
__________________
http://samoff.com
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to timsamoff For This Useful Post:
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#48
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
I regard categories based on post count as being redundant of post count (we can easily see who has >100, etc).

I would rather have some useful descriptive information. Possibly, self-selection of a category reflective of the user's interest in Maemo - "app developer", "user", "just visiting", "tablet devotee", etc.
This idea may be a good one, but it requires more effort than changing the labels and thresholds of the current categories; which is what Ryan's asking about.

What about 5 categories:
  • Red
  • Green
  • Blue
  • Yellow
  • Orange

Thresholds to be assigned semi-randomly. They're abstract & meaningless, let's make them so :-)
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#49
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Personally, I'm most siding with the ideas of dropping it altogether, and having the post headings based on the pervasive maemo.org user header.
Using the user header from maemo.org could work.

I would have backed the "remove titles entirely" crowd except that I anticipate an influx of new users once that Maemo 5 lead device goes on sale. Furthermore, I expect quite a number of those new users will have frequented other Internet forums, and I can just see a "Here's an idea, let's add titles" thread taking off eight months from now.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#50
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Using the user header from maemo.org could work.
Another reason I like it is that it better ensures that the web fora to the maemo-* mailing lists looks consistent with talk.maemo.org.

Furthermore, I expect quite a number of those new users will have frequented other Internet forums, and I can just see a "Here's an idea, let's add titles" thread taking off eight months from now.
Hmm. Maybe. Happy to defend - in 8 months time - the right decision now. Well, at least once ;-)
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 
Reply

Tags
bikeshed color, waste of time, whoring for harmattan


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:46.