![]() |
2009-04-03
, 15:51
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Charlotte, NC
|
#302
|
The Following User Says Thank You to eetimm For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:06
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#303
|
You finally are making some sense....this will get more attention on the Internet, and those finding this thread will be influenced by the content. Unfortunately for you, they will see one person insisting that this thing does not work, and many, many people explaining how well it actually does work.
While I appreciate your Quixote-like stance, you are still tilting at windmills here.
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:14
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#304
|
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:23
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#305
|
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:24
|
Posts: 174 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#306
|
The unit is not defective, you're going on blanket assumptions made by technically inexperienced posters on this forum. This is evidenced by their ornery behaviour, cocky attitude and careless statements.
Again as a testament to the inability of all the trolls (especially dick-richardson who has been especially persistent with assumptions and lies), I explained why I'm still posting to this thread. As a big warning sign to people that the N810 is defective by design.
Which again, I've provided information about, but nobody refutes.
There's no technicality you can get away with without first disproving my points. Which as I will repeat yet again just to be nice: Is proven in many places on the internet outside of this site.
Enjoy eating mud. But the more this thread gets attention, the better it will SEO! Thanks!
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:29
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#307
|
And yet these "technically inexperienced posters" aren't having the problems you are.
Where's the list of devices from 6 years ago that work better than the n810? Demonstrate anywhere on this forum where you did even the most rudimentary troubleshooting. Your belief that whining on this forum is going to make even the slightest dent on Nokia's bottom line is laughable.
Yes, I have. Repeatedly and with as much substance as your claims.
Your points are unfounded and backed anecdotal evidence, which I can produce as well, and in greater quantities.
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:36
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#308
|
...
...
...
http://www.hawkee.com/shop/review/169040/
LOL!
The commercially available quality software such as Office 2007 tools are not available.
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:37
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#309
|
![]() |
2009-04-03
, 16:39
|
|
Posts: 1,028 |
Thanked: 578 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
@ Chicago
|
#310
|
OK, who added the good tags to this thread?
I admit to "dick-size contest" and "n810 doesn't give head":
![]() |
Tags |
n810 is a ripoff, n900 is useless, nokia ripoff, not as advertised, paid too much, unresponsive |
|
That's well rounded foolishness on your part.
Again as a testament to the inability of all the trolls (especially dick-richardson who has been especially persistent with assumptions and lies), I explained why I'm still posting to this thread. As a big warning sign to people that the N810 is defective by design.
Which again, I've provided information about, but nobody refutes. There's no technicality you can get away with without first disproving my points. Which as I will repeat yet again just to be nice: Is proven in many places on the internet outside of this site.
Enjoy eating mud. But the more this thread gets attention, the better it will SEO! Thanks!