Reply
Thread Tools
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#71
Originally Posted by fms View Post
Given that for many pages there is no way to have page fit the tablet screen with a reasonable font size, without the "Fit to page" feature, and that many tablet users do want this feature, in one shape or the other, have you considered implementing a similar feature from scratch and adding it to the new (Fremantle) browser? To avoid breaking page layouts, it may be useful to rename it to "Try fitting to width", and bail out on HTML elements that cannot be resized.
FWTV is dropped. Some users will miss it, some users won't.

A couple of questions to consider. Is Mozilla upstream considering this feature? Ultimately that is the upstream project where those features should be pushed. Is FWTV a feature that can be added as an extension through addFons or...: You know, at the end all this is open source.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
noventa98's Avatar
Posts: 122 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Paris, France
#72
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
FWTV is dropped. Some users will miss it, some users won't.
Thanks for the info. I thought that was not final. We could have spared the discussion...

If somebody will come up with a FWTV features that can be added to the browser, ok.

Let's see what Fremantle and the new hardware will offer to improve rendering and readability of web sites where current users switch-on the FWTV and zoom-in function.

Regards,
Antonio

EDIT: better orthography for better readability...

Last edited by noventa98; 2009-04-28 at 15:02.
 
Posts: 1,950 | Thanked: 1,174 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Seattle, USA
#73
Tell me if I'm wrong ...

All MicroB is open source
The code used for FWTV can readily be identified and lifted
The browser that ships with the "N900" will accept add-ons
A good programmer could modify the MicroB code and make FWTV an add-on for the new browser
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#74
Addons are javascript, a whole restyling action is going to require quite a bit of juice with javascript and probably will be slower (or much slower without the JIT). But doable nontheless.
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#75
Originally Posted by Bundyo View Post
Addons are javascript, a whole restyling action is going to require quite a bit of juice with javascript and probably will be slower (or much slower without the JIT). But doable nontheless.
Alternatively, just go right in and patch the code.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#76
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Alternatively, just go right in and patch the code.
This feature is not as simple as "patching the code". It requires lots of thoughtwork.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#77
Originally Posted by Bundyo View Post
Addons are javascript, a whole restyling action is going to require quite a bit of juice with javascript and probably will be slower (or much slower without the JIT). But doable nontheless.
BTW, is it possible to implement fit-to-width in Tear? =)
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#78
If I had any control over the rendering from outside, maybe I can try

There are some helpful CSS and javascript tips here btw:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.p...70613235507819
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.

Last edited by Bundyo; 2009-04-28 at 19:53.
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#79
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Is Mozilla upstream considering this feature? Ultimately that is the upstream project where those features should be pushed.
To save some searching, "Implement 'Fit to window width' as in Opera 8.0 (no-horizontal-scrollbar mode)" is Bug 276166 in Mozilla Bugzilla. In a little more than four years, it has accumulated twenty votes, ten comments, and no developers.

Still, upstream is the place to fight for this feature. Vote the bug up. The going in-favor argument there seems to be tied to small screens on UMPCs and netbooks. As that's a new and fast growing market segment, you might find some increased interest in the feature.
__________________
maemo.org profile

Last edited by sjgadsby; 2009-04-28 at 20:04.
 

The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,950 | Thanked: 1,174 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Seattle, USA
#80
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
To save some searching, "Implement 'Fit to window width' as in Opera 8.0 (no-horizontal-scrollbar mode)" is Bug 276166 in Mozilla Bugzilla. In a little more than four years, it has accumulated twenty votes, ten comments, and no developers.

Still, upstream is the place to fight for this feature. Vote the bug up. The going in-favor argument there seems to be tied to small screens on UMPCs and netbooks. As that's a new and fast growing market segment, you might find some increased interest in the feature.
Thanks, sjgadsby, for making this easy.

I just signed up and posted a Comment in favor. I'd "vote" for it if there is such a thing, but I haven't figured out how to.
 
Reply

Tags
fixed in harmattan, what is microb?


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:58.