|
2009-05-17
, 00:07
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#1572
|
And that's the idea behind the virtual world or web data base. From the reported location, orientation, and direction of the device a calculation would be made and the display would be relative. No need for laser range finders.
In fact the application could "know" if it is daylight or night time, if it is fair, overcast, or raining.
|
2009-05-17
, 00:29
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1573
|
|
2009-05-17
, 00:49
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#1574
|
For example ray-tracers use a such an algorithm to determine which surface a cast ray intersects with. I suspect something similar could be done with more simple targets (eg. a large cuboid for a building), and limiting the intersect-able objects based on their relative position.
|
2009-05-17
, 02:04
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#1575
|
There is a very limited amount of places that have accurate *vertical* mapping, and even less that have it on the level of buildings. Two, imagine a photo of a city panorama. I might be (trying to) point to a building but I will have always hundreds of potential points that will also be on the screen, between and around me and the target object. The further away your target is, the bigger this problem is - that's why I mentioned distance meters which would give you a pinpoint location of the target, not a line containing multiple possible targets. But, as said, if it's just 'hey what's this building I'm next to', you're good to go even with N810 class hardware.
|
2009-05-21
, 23:09
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1576
|
|
2009-05-22
, 00:24
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#1577
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-22
, 12:42
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1578
|
Just to avoid confusion, it's a forum Nokia community blog, which is probably not what people associate with 'official'
|
2009-05-22
, 14:19
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cincinnati, Ohio USA
|
#1579
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheGogmagog For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-23
, 04:40
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#1580
|
I'm with johnkzin on this one, the N800 was a bit big, N810 is just right for me.
Tags |
dpads are fun, ideas, n900, n900 wishlist, revenge of the styli, stuff for nokia to read, the wrath of sty, wishlist |
|
And that's the idea behind the virtual world or web data base. From the reported location, orientation, and direction of the device a calculation would be made and the display would be relative. No need for laser range finders.
In fact the application could "know" if it is daylight or night time, if it is fair, overcast, or raining.
Granted that is a lot of stored and transmitted data, not to mention the CPU needed to parse and display it all. However, in time those concerns will be meaningless.