Reply
Thread Tools
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#81
Originally Posted by bergie View Post
As we already heard in this thread, the screen size reduction isn't really that noticeable when you actually use the device.

I also got to play with the development device, and I have to say: cool! Much faster than N810, with better keyboard and touchscreen. And Midgard2 runs!
Good that you did not notice any difference with the screen size. But if it looked so good on a 3.5 screen how many times more nicer would it look in a 4.1 or greater screen.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sachin007 For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#82
Originally Posted by Mara View Post
I think there is one key difference: The GPS you most likely use only in the car... so why not just leave it there all the time? The media player though... that you take with you everywhere, so there you have a point.
Because I like having my GPS on foot, too.

Really, the N810 is almost ideal for me all around and I usually don't mind its bulk. In fact I don't get why so many people get so hung up over it, and I still laugh at the old race to get cell phones so thin. At some point size reduction means a sacrifice in usability, but again that depends largely on use case. But trim the N810 a bit, add an *option* to plug in a WLAN radio card as I can with a laptop and I will be ecstatic.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#83
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
We just can't get away from that Other Device Required paradigm, can we?
Exactly.

I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
  • Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
  • Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
  • Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
  • Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
  • Pocketable PIM-type device
  • Pocketable Media Player
  • Pocketable Game Player
  • Pocketable GPS

(* included because, depending on your perspective, the phone might be the "primary device", or the "other device")

Any solution for my pocket where I have to get some or all of those functions by carrying "another device" is an insufficient solution.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 

The Following User Says Thank You to johnkzin For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,097 | Thanked: 650 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#84
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I'm sticking with my opinion that the first ~4" screen without the N810's peripheral real estate will be a mind-blowing success.

I take that back: COULD be.
Aha! I like that ~4" part. Very diplomatic of you in treading a middle ground ... but that's what we should all be doing instead of being so vociferous about 3.5" against 4" on a device none of us have handled. Now on I am going to call it a ~4" screen even though I know the exact screen size.
 
pycage's Avatar
Posts: 3,404 | Thanked: 4,474 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ Germany
#85
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Exactly.

I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
  • Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
  • Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
  • Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
  • Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
  • Pocketable PIM-type device
  • Pocketable Media Player
  • Pocketable Game Player
  • Pocketable GPS
IMHO there's still a big show stopper with current technology: the battery life time!
It's currently not feasible to have all on one device because the batteries run emtpy too fast.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pycage For This Useful Post:
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#86
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Exactly.

I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
  • Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
  • Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
  • Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
  • Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
  • Pocketable Media Player
  • Pocketable Game Player
  • Pocketable GPS
Yeah so does everyone. But all the above things mentioned are better on a bigger screen. So why not have an option to have a device with a bigger screen.
 
Posts: 1,097 | Thanked: 650 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#87
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
Good that you did not notice any difference with the screen size. But if it looked so good on a 3.5 screen how many times more nicer would it look in a 4.1 or greater screen.
Yes, I do agree - how much nicer would it look on a 7" screen - just imagine (but I am drooling with the thought)... but why oh why didn't Nokia make the tablets 7" in the first place ?

Because for a nice pocketable Tablet form factor 4" was considered just perfect by the Nokia designers.

Similarly for a pocketable form and use as a Phone form factor, a 3.5" (or ~ 4" to quote Texrat) is an ideal form factor as considered by Nokia, Samsung, Apple, Motorola and other phone mfrs.

Yes granted for those who are not looking for a phone in a tablet - your main quibble can be that why include a phone and drive up the prices, lock down the device, etc etc.
But the main point seems to be stuck at why a < 4" screen on the new "phone" device ? Lets get over that - as that is a part of the best form-factor for a phone (and we know the N900 is going to be a phone).

Its about time we accepted that yes - Nokia has decided to bring out a Maemo phone first rather than another Maemo tablet (which might come later). So if that is accepted, then I think we can now all agree that for a phone, a 3.5" screen seems a good enough fit and not that noticeble a downgrade (in fact I wouldn't want to hold up a 4" or > 4" screened phone to my ears).
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nilchak For This Useful Post:
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#88
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
Yeah so does everyone.
Not everyone. There are definitely people who argue against the single device approach, and, for example, insist on having their phone be separate from their tablet.

But all the above things mentioned are better on a bigger screen. So why not have an option to have a device with a bigger screen.
Oh, I definitely agree that I'd rather have it on a 4"ish screen. But, in my experience of moving from a 4.3" NIT to a 3.x" Android G1 device, I haven't really noticed the loss. The main things where I might see it being a problem are:

1) Car GPS
2) E-Book Reader

And, frankly, I don't do either of those ... and if I did the latter, I wouldn't do it on a 4"ish screen, either. That's too small for me. The smaller kindle is really the minimum e-book reader I'd go with. That's really something I'd apply to my non-pocketable device (so, a Maemo convertible tablet netbook would be better suited for that, to me).
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#89
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
I'm trying my best to consolidate gadgets. When I go to my car now, it's:

Nokia N810
Garmin GPS
iPhone 3G
Sony PSP or Nintendo DSi (sometimes)

There's an overlap in features, but I'm tired of carrying so much to my car and charging so much while in the house. I wanted to get rid of two of these... the Nokia N810/Garmin GPS (originally the N810's GPS was to be the only one... yeah right).
I'd say..leave the Garmin GPS in the trunk (assuming it's not baking temperature) since both the iPhone and Nokia suffers from dedicated POI mapping navigation wise. (Finding alternative routes or finding a Starbucks) But if it's basic navigation the n810 or IPhone can easily replace it. For gaming the iPhone does it decently but I'd still prefer a PSP or DS anyday.

Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Exactly.

I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
  • Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
  • Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
  • Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
  • Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
  • Pocketable PIM-type device
  • Pocketable Media Player
  • Pocketable Game Player
  • Pocketable GPS

(* included because, depending on your perspective, the phone might be the "primary device", or the "other device")

Any solution for my pocket where I have to get some or all of those functions by carrying "another device" is an insufficient solution.
My problem with those solutions has always been this thing called battery life. I'm always bound to overuse the game player aspect of a device which leaves the battery dead for when I need to use the phone. Which is why if I'm going game I carry a dedicated gaming device, the other features can easily be combined into a phone (given enough storage size and decent specs)
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#90
Originally Posted by nilchak View Post
Yes, I do agree - how much nicer would it look on a 7" screen - just imagine (but I am drooling with the thought)... but why oh why didn't Nokia make the tablets 7" in the first place ?

Because for a nice pocketable Tablet form factor 4" was considered just perfect by the Nokia designers.

Similarly for a pocketable form and use as a Phone form factor, a 3.5" (or ~ 4" to quote Texrat) is an ideal form factor as considered by Nokia, Samsung, Apple, Motorola and other phone mfrs.

Yes granted for those who are not looking for a phone in a tablet - your main quibble can be that why include a phone and drive up the prices, lock down the device, etc etc.
But the main point seems to be stuck at why a < 4" screen on the new "phone" device ? Lets get over that - as that is a part of the best form-factor for a phone (and we know the N900 is going to be a phone).

Its about time we accepted that yes - Nokia has decided to bring out a Maemo phone first rather than another Maemo tablet (which might come later). So if that is accepted, then I think we can now all agree that for a phone, a 3.5" screen seems a good enough fit and not that noticeble a downgrade (in fact I wouldn't want to hold up a 4" or > 4" screened phone to my ears).
It is absolutely good that nokia is releasing a maemo phone. But all signs are pointing towards the discontinuation of the tablets. I understand that it is not official but we gotta work with what we have. For some of us it is a big disappointment since we were following this forum for tablet type devices.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sachin007 For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52.