Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
silvermountain's Avatar
Posts: 1,359 | Thanked: 717 times | Joined on May 2009 @ ...standing right behind you...
#1
Hmm... http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/06...-disaster.html
__________________
.N810 experience: Since 6/2009
My Twenty Favorite OS2008 Applications:
AutoScan, Diablo5 Theme, Dialcentral, DragLock, EmelFM2, FlipClock, gPodder, Headphoned, Knots 2, Maemo Mapper, mPlayer, openNTPD, OpenSSH, Panucci, Personal Launcher, QuickNote, Seqretary, SlideLock, Telescope, YellowNotes
 
Cadabena's Avatar
Posts: 240 | Thanked: 71 times | Joined on Jun 2008
#2
The first eee was a revolution because of Linux. How could they possibly think this is a good move? Besides the rather beefy cheque I imagine Microsoft has tempted them with... getting scared of the OS market moving away from a monopoly. Damn, I hate Microsoft
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#3
Less competition for Nokia's upcoming netbooks...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#4
Meh, money talks and Linux is a niche. I'm in that niche, of course, so it pains me, but this isn't something new.

I've gotten used to vendors experimenting with Linux and/or open source and then abandoning the idea. Apple and Darwin come to mind, and "evil" Microsoft wasn't even involved in that one.

(Which makes Maemo all the more unprecedented, by the way)...
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#5
I took Linux off my eee 1000h and am just running Win 7 there. When Linux achieves decent text-to-speech I'll consider changing back.

On my Desktop computer, I was running two versions of Linux for a year or so. No Windows. Now I am running Fedora and Win 7 there. Why?

I like Win 7. It has text to speech. It has speech to text. Linux has neither, in a form that is acceptable to me.

Also, Win 7 is nice in general.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#6
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
I like Win 7. It has text to speech. It has speech to text. Linux has neither, in a form that is acceptable to me.
A huge opportunity for Nokia there, if they would only capitalize on it...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 109 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Apr 2009
#7
Complete overreaction. Next to no one purchased an eee for the built in linux distro (Xandros) - it sucked pretty hard. XP is much harder to get installable from a flash drive than most common linux distros, and if you are going to be overwriting Xandros anyways does it really make a difference? The only real issue I see is people being butthurt about having to pay for a 15 dollar XP licence - most of whom are just people who wanted to pirate Windows to save some money. Yes, for those who strive for a life independent of Windows, that does suck a little.

Now if they provided a linux distro worth keeping, it would be a different story...
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#8
Originally Posted by qole View Post
Meh, money talks and Linux is a niche. I'm in that niche, of course, so it pains me, but this isn't something new.

I've gotten used to vendors experimenting with Linux and/or open source and then abandoning the idea. Apple and Darwin come to mind, and "evil" Microsoft wasn't even involved in that one.

(Which makes Maemo all the more unprecedented, by the way)...
I'm also used to anticompetitive business decisions to mute Linux. Say, for instance, ACPI crippling aimed at Linux in particular (i.w. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=869249). Take from that what you will.
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#9
Originally Posted by notnarb View Post
Complete overreaction. Next to no one purchased an eee for the built in linux distro (Xandros) - it sucked pretty hard. XP is much harder to get installable from a flash drive than most common linux distros, and if you are going to be overwriting Xandros anyways does it really make a difference? The only real issue I see is people being butthurt about having to pay for a 15 dollar XP licence - most of whom are just people who wanted to pirate Windows to save some money. Yes, for those who strive for a life independent of Windows, that does suck a little.

Now if they provided a linux distro worth keeping, it would be a different story...
Yeah, I bet even Linux addicts didn't keep the original distro on board. I know I haven't. It simply sucked too much. Its easy to blame it on Linux overall though.
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.

Last edited by Bundyo; 2009-06-12 at 22:21.
 
BrentDC's Avatar
Posts: 903 | Thanked: 632 times | Joined on Apr 2008
#10


* Proudly posted from my Kubuntu Box.
__________________
-Brent

Author of TouchSearch -- web searching software for Maemo 5.

Mobile Device lineage: Palm Z22 -> Palm TX -> Nokia N800 -> Nokia N900
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:42.