![]() |
2009-06-13
, 20:48
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#1272
|
Um, nowhere is the word "phone" mentioned in the title, or even in the article the first post linked to.
Some of the mentioned software features:
(...)
* All SMS and IMs accessible from one view
* Cellular voice or VOIP both supported
![]() |
2009-06-13
, 22:03
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#1273
|
There you go. Not just a GSM data device (like several other MIDs that have been announced in the last year or so). The fact that it clearly says that both cellular voice and VOIP will be supported indicates that they are directly stating that this device will have a voice capability that is not just VOIP based.
The device being discussed is a cell phone. The device in question has both cellular voice, and SMS. It's clearly a cell phone, in addition to everything else it's supposed to be.
Clearly you didn't read the first few days worth of the thread, because that was one of the main discussion points for the first week or so (that and the screen size; but the two are related, since "it's a cell phone" is the justification for the smaller screen size).
![]() |
2009-06-13
, 22:29
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#1274
|
![]() |
2009-06-13
, 22:56
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#1275
|
Says the article linked in the original post, which this thread is about.
From the article linked in the original post of the thread (bold emphasis from me):
There you go. Not just a GSM data device (like several other MIDs that have been announced in the last year or so). The fact that it clearly says that both cellular voice and VOIP will be supported indicates that they are directly stating that this device will have a voice capability that is not just VOIP based.
The device being discussed is a cell phone. The device in question has both cellular voice, and SMS. It's clearly a cell phone, in addition to everything else it's supposed to be.
Clearly you didn't read the first few days worth of the thread, because that was one of the main discussion points for the first week or so (that and the screen size; but the two are related, since "it's a cell phone" is the justification for the smaller screen size).
![]() |
2009-06-13
, 23:04
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#1276
|
![]() |
2009-06-13
, 23:34
|
Posts: 1,950 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Seattle, USA
|
#1277
|
So, the theory is that these additional capacities would be added and the device would be made smaller for no particular reason?
To me, the only real reason for doing this stuff would be because you're producing a phone.
So, I must have missed a point somewhere, sorry about that.
What would be the reason for these changes if the new device ISN'T a phone?
The Following User Says Thank You to GeraldKo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-06-14
, 00:46
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#1278
|
So, the theory is that these additional capacities would be added and the device would be made smaller for no particular reason?
To me, the only real reason for doing this stuff would be because you're producing a phone.
So, I must have missed a point somewhere, sorry about that.
What would be the reason for these changes if the new device ISN'T a phone?
![]() |
2009-06-14
, 00:48
|
|
Posts: 294 |
Thanked: 174 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#1279
|
![]() |
2009-06-14
, 01:02
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 145 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Sydney, Australia
|
#1280
|
![]() |
Tags |
disapointed by nokia, dpad, maemo phone, my tablet is crying, n900, nokia gets it wrong, openmoko, rover, rx-51, rx-71 needed, screen size, smartphone, t-mobile |
|
So, I don't think there's any strong indication in the fact that we've confirmed something we already knew.