|
2009-08-05
, 08:21
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#2
|
|
2009-08-05
, 08:27
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ United Kingdom
|
#3
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chrisboff For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-08-05
, 10:38
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#4
|
|
2009-08-05
, 11:02
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#5
|
|
2009-08-05
, 13:57
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#6
|
|
2009-08-05
, 14:09
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
|
#7
|
|
2009-08-05
, 14:11
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
|
#8
|
|
2009-08-05
, 14:17
|
Posts: 4,030 |
Thanked: 1,633 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ nd usa
|
#9
|
It's also known that (copied) CDs die after some time, or harddisks. Are you concerned about it?
|
2009-08-05
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#10
|
- swap partition
- browser cache, temp files, and all data to be written at runtime
- user specific data, like config files, data files, etc...
If I should be concerned, what's the best practice to prolong the life of flash memory in case of N810? Ideally, I hope to use the internal flash and 2GB memory just to store read-only files (written only when I install new apps), and store all other data to the external SD memory. Is this possible?
Oh, by the way, after reading many posts here, I'm still not sure class 6 SDHC cards are better than 4. Is the bottleneck the N810, or will class 6 provide better performance?