|
2009-09-05
, 12:51
|
|
Posts: 1,436 |
Thanked: 3,144 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#52
|
|
2009-09-05
, 12:53
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#53
|
|
2009-09-05
, 12:56
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#54
|
Well, it looks like AT&T might be eyeing the N900 after all:
http://maemotalk.com/2009/09/05/att-...he-nokia-n900/
|
2009-09-05
, 13:04
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#55
|
Tell me something, name one popular phone in the US that's made their mark in the US market without getting carrier subsidy.
|
2009-09-05
, 13:12
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Texas
|
#56
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rcadden For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-05
, 13:20
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#57
|
|
2009-09-05
, 13:34
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#58
|
@attila77: what exactly is the false conclusion? Those are the prices available to the public. I don't expect him to explain why nokia failed to get the subsidized pricing at this point in time, and he's already touched on the issue by giving an approximate lowered price IF T-mobile picks it up.
|
2009-09-05
, 13:46
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#59
|
|
2009-09-05
, 14:09
|
Posts: 341 |
Thanked: 607 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#60
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to kanishou For This Useful Post: | ||
Right, no phone has gotten thru US's 'thick' market without carrier subsidies. So I'm not expecting the N900 to garner popularity at $650 a pop. That's essentially what the writer was driving at and I agree with him.