Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#131
@sachin: The htc G1 (android) has portrait mode without on-screen keyboard in their initial OS release.
 
eiffel's Avatar
Posts: 600 | Thanked: 742 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ England
#132
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
...i think this video clearly shows how responsive it is.
http://www.gearlog.com/2009/09/hands...nokia_n900.php
You mean like at 1:43 where he jabs the screen and nothing happens?
 
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#133
Originally Posted by eiffel View Post
You mean like at 1:43 where he jabs the screen and nothing happens?
Yeah make that an exception. But look how smooth it reacts when he swipes the panoramic desktop.
 
Posts: 232 | Thanked: 106 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Chicago/D.C./Katowice
#134
Originally Posted by dccupp View Post
Another thought about capacitive... correct me if I'm mistaken but you can't use screen covers with capacitive screens. I use a screen cover with my 5800.

you can still use a cover with the cap screens

really though, all this talk about res vs cap is funny

they both have their places, cap probably in a more media centered device, resistive in a more professional device.


and seriously doubting the sensitivity of a resistive? my older car(urquattro) has a garmin gps unit(cheapy 300$) in it and it works fine with light pressure, it doesnt come with a stylus either.


edit:i think the infiniti has a built in resistive screen as well(never gave any trouble, so i never looked to see what it was), guess what i finger swipe it just fine as well, oh yea, no stylus as well

and as long as the ts works(as example in the infiniti) it doesnt matter what it is

Last edited by UCOMM; 2009-09-18 at 21:19.
 
eiffel's Avatar
Posts: 600 | Thanked: 742 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ England
#135
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
...does anyone know of a smartphone with capcitative screen and atleast the same resolution of the n900 which has already been released?
The closest I'm aware of is the Samsung i8910 Omnia HD, which has a 3.7 inch 640x360 capacitive screen.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i8910_omnia_hd-2691.php

Amongst unreleased phones, the HTC Leo has a 4.3 inch 800x480 capacitive screen:
http://www.electronista.com/articles...touch.evident/

Regards,
Roger
 
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#136
Haha. This is hilarious. It's like arguing the value of a vehicle on the choice of securing the spare tire using square nuts over hexagonal nuts.

As long as the screen works well as a touch screen (as it seems to), it's not going to matter past the spec page. There are more important factors to base decisions on.

This thread is striken with fanboitis. Apparently one of the symptoms is pointing the finger....

}:^)~
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,096 | Thanked: 760 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#137
I can see capacitive being kind of difficult on 800x480 in 3.5 inches. I mean how exact could a capacitive be in that situation maybe on some web forms with check boxes or radio buttons? I guess you can zoom in or something.
 
sachin007's Avatar
Posts: 2,041 | Thanked: 1,066 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Houston
#138
Originally Posted by eiffel View Post
The closest I'm aware of is the Samsung i8910 Omnia HD, which has a 3.7 inch 640x360 capacitive screen.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i8910_omnia_hd-2691.php

Amongst unreleased phones, the HTC Leo has a 4.3 inch 800x480 capacitive screen:
http://www.electronista.com/articles...touch.evident/

Regards,
Roger
So at this point of time there is no capacitative touch screen device with greater than 640x360. May be that was one more reason not to use capacitative screen for now. Anyway nokia is seriously looking at multi-touch/capicitative screen for maemo 6....
 
Posts: 607 | Thanked: 450 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC
#139
Now that we've established that resistive is better because capacitive is too sensitive except for those times when capacitive is better because resistive is not sensitive enough. And forgetting for the moment the advantages of being able to use a stylus with gloves versus the benefits of being able to use your nose when your gloves are too thick to hold a stylus. I'd like to discuss another comment by Paul Miller, to wit:

"I don't think Nokia thinks we can comprehend their smartphone operating system and I think they might be right."

Is the Maemo 5 UI still too complicated for the average consumer who confuses Linux with Charlie Brown's friend?
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DaveP1 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 52 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Washington, DC
#140
If you watch that section again, I'm pretty sure that he's actually talking about the Symbian OS.

They are talking about how Nokia hasn't been pushing their smartphone platform here in the US.

That's actually a pretty common criticism of Symbian, that it's too complicated.

Aside from their complaints about the touchscreen (which to be honest, folks on this board should prepare to hear lots more once it launches, whether right or wrong), they didn't really have anything bad to say about Maemo.

Originally Posted by DaveP1 View Post
Now that we've established that resistive is better because capacitive is too sensitive except for those times when capacitive is better because resistive is not sensitive enough. And forgetting for the moment the advantages of being able to use a stylus with gloves versus the benefits of being able to use your nose when your gloves are too thick to hold a stylus. I'd like to discuss another comment by Paul Miller, to wit:

"I don't think Nokia thinks we can comprehend their smartphone operating system and I think they might be right."

Is the Maemo 5 UI still too complicated for the average consumer who confuses Linux with Charlie Brown's friend?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to switchfiend For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01.