|
2009-09-22
, 21:56
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#42
|
I don't get this... The Images app (how you view images) can be in landscape and portrait. But the camera?
If you want to take a photo in portrait, you hold the device in portrait -- just like a regular camera. If the camera had to switch to portrait mode, you'd still be taking your photo in landscape (because the view would rotate), but it'd be shrunk to fit in the portrait view.
Or, am I missing something?
Tim
|
2009-09-24
, 08:47
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#43
|
|
2009-09-24
, 11:35
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#44
|
Enhancements go to Brainstorm.
There are 3 entries related to portrait mode but none of them has solutions proposed that people can vote:
Implement portrait mode in Fremantle Media Player (audio)
Implement portrait mode for Fremantle Messaging
Implement portrait mode in Fremantle Maps
Note that the browser has been mentioned it here as a primary case but there is no brainstorm proposal related to it.
|
2009-09-24
, 11:47
|
Posts: 547 |
Thanked: 1,383 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Stockholm, Sweden
|
#45
|
Hi, polls are nice but if you *really* want to influence directly the support for portrait mode in the Maemo releases and actually help making it happen you could better invest your energies in the Brainstorm.
fwiw we are dragging the attention of tghe related product managers. The Brainstorm ideas are still empty and this thread is approaching 500 posts. I have no idea anymore whether there are good proposals for solutions in this looong thread that could be summarized and voted in the Brainstorm.
By now I can only tell to them "the community would like to have more support for portrait mode". Which is not bad, but after all this discussion...
Thank you!
|
2009-09-24
, 22:11
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#46
|
|
2009-09-24
, 23:16
|
|
Posts: 70 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ London, UK
|
#47
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason404 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-24
, 23:24
|
|
Posts: 70 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ London, UK
|
#48
|
I just sorta had a thought. Does anyone what EXIF data the cameras seem to support?
I ask because I am wondering if portrait orientation EXIF data is out of the question.
The accelerometer determines if it is held in as portrait/horizontal (0 or 1) and writes this to the EXIF properties, and then an image viewer could recognize this and rotate it as needed/desired.
Additionally I think this feature, should it exist, should be enable/disable optional as I can see it annoying certain people.
|
2009-09-25
, 00:45
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#49
|
|
2009-09-25
, 01:15
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#50
|
you can't SAVE a jpeg with rotated *pixels* without quality loss (or file size increase).
The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
nokia v. upright ppl war, portrait mode |
|
Maemo-Freak.com
"...and the Freaks shall inherit the Earth."