Poll: Who did you vote for Maemo Community Council
Poll Options
Who did you vote for Maemo Community Council

Reply
Thread Tools
penguinbait's Avatar
Posts: 3,096 | Thanked: 1,525 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Michigan, USA
#61
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
Straw man.

However I forgot about STV... indeed, STV makes a compare with real-life election systems (usually some form of plurality) inaccurate because STV provides a lot more protection mechanisms against tactical voting.

But maybe a non-candidate could have started the exit poll. Penguinbait, are you able to see who voted for who in the exit poll?
I AM NOT ABLE TO SEE WHO VOTED OR FOR WHAT.

I suppose Reggie probably could, and I am not sure who else.

But no I am not able to see who voted, or how anyone voted.

This is an anonymous poll.
__________________
To all my Maemo friends. I will no longer be monitoring any of my threads here on a regular basis. I am no longer supporting anything I did under maemo at maemo.org. If you need some help with something you can reach me at tablethacker.com or www.facebook.com/penguinbait. I have disabled my PM's here, and removed myself from Council email and Community mailing list. There has been some fun times, see you around.
 
penguinbait's Avatar
Posts: 3,096 | Thanked: 1,525 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Michigan, USA
#62
Originally Posted by JayOnThaBeat View Post
Wow, I didn't see anything uncouth at all about the poll until it was just pointed out that a candidate started it.

Why would it matter who started the thread / poll ??
__________________
To all my Maemo friends. I will no longer be monitoring any of my threads here on a regular basis. I am no longer supporting anything I did under maemo at maemo.org. If you need some help with something you can reach me at tablethacker.com or www.facebook.com/penguinbait. I have disabled my PM's here, and removed myself from Council email and Community mailing list. There has been some fun times, see you around.
 
Posts: 2,152 | Thanked: 1,490 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Czech Republic
#63
Originally Posted by penguinbait View Post
As I also stated STV (like Fanoush) makes this impossible.
It does not make it impossible. I just meant that if people know how STV works they should not be discouraged by low results of their preferred candidates in your exit poll. They still can vote for him without fear of having their votes lost.

Still one can look at poll results and be tempted to help some other candidate than his preferred one on the ground that the preferred one doesn't need his vote so much which can later backfire. So I definitely think this exit poll was not a good idea because it can affect real results. I just don't think in this specific case it is dangerous enough to be taken down. And I do see some positives too (already explained).

Still, maybe there should be some rule about exit polls next time?
__________________
Newbies click here before posting. Thanks.

If you really need to PM me with troubleshooting question please consider posting it to the forum instead. It is OK to PM me a link to such post then. Thank you.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fanoush For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#64
Originally Posted by fanoush View Post
Maybe there is still some space for tactical voting but fortunately most if not all candidates are great so we cannot spoil much here :-)
Actually, there's still a lot of space for tactical voting with STV. It feels like rather a weak compromise between plurailty and RRV, honestly.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
penguinbait's Avatar
Posts: 3,096 | Thanked: 1,525 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Michigan, USA
#65
I guess what I was trying to say is look at AndrewFBlack, currently with the lowest number of votes in this poll. However he could be EVERYONE's second choice. Guaranteeing him a spot on council.


Am I understanding this correctly? It seems to me people are taking this a little too seriously, but I guess that's just my opinion. The fact that this poll can be voted in by people who cannot even vote for council makes it pretty invalid. The fact that its an STV vote and this is not makes the outcome of this poll even more useless.

But at least it gives people something to b1tch about while we are waiting for the election to conclude. You can thank me for that at least...
__________________
To all my Maemo friends. I will no longer be monitoring any of my threads here on a regular basis. I am no longer supporting anything I did under maemo at maemo.org. If you need some help with something you can reach me at tablethacker.com or www.facebook.com/penguinbait. I have disabled my PM's here, and removed myself from Council email and Community mailing list. There has been some fun times, see you around.
 
Posts: 2,152 | Thanked: 1,490 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Czech Republic
#66
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Actually, there's still a lot of space for tactical voting with STV.
Yes but as the most harmful form of tactical voting I consider giving up one's preferred candidate because of despair that he won't get in. This reasoning may be well-founded so in fact you may feel you have no choice and this makes candidates which are not strong even weaker. STV solves this.

OTOH If you voluntarily vote for other candidate because your favorite one feels strong enough then you are rightfully punished for greediness and free riding when this backfires.

Or is there other sort of tactical voting here?
__________________
Newbies click here before posting. Thanks.

If you really need to PM me with troubleshooting question please consider posting it to the forum instead. It is OK to PM me a link to such post then. Thank you.

Last edited by fanoush; 2009-09-23 at 13:48.
 
zerojay's Avatar
Posts: 2,669 | Thanked: 2,555 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#67
Wow, this thread is STILL going.

You guys obviously think about all this stuff far more than I ever have. About the only "tactic" I used in my voting (the real election - I haven't placed my vote here) is simply not voting for myself and choosing the people that I think would best do the job.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to zerojay For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#68
Sjgadsby's thanks on the post above compelled me to also click it.

ooo, this influence stuff is seductive!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
mullf's Avatar
Posts: 610 | Thanked: 391 times | Joined on Feb 2006 @ DC, USA
#69
Originally Posted by fanoush View Post
Still one can look at poll results and be tempted to help some other candidate than his preferred one on the ground that the preferred one doesn't need his vote so much which can later backfire. So I definitely think this exit poll was not a good idea because it can affect real results.
Well, the actual voting results were visible during the time the election had prematurely ended.

Edit: What I meant was that the raw voting results were visible. That is, the list of all the authentication tokens and their corresponding votes was visible, so you could see all the votes, and count them up if you wanted to. There was no tally of votes visible. Sorry for the confusion.
__________________
Nokia 770 Internet Tablet = best device ever made

Deuteronomy 13:6-10; 2 Kings 2:23-24; Judges 19:22-29

Last edited by mullf; 2009-09-27 at 17:00.
 
mullf's Avatar
Posts: 610 | Thanked: 391 times | Joined on Feb 2006 @ DC, USA
#70
Originally Posted by JayOnThaBeat View Post
how close were the results to the ones seen here?
I didn't bother to count up all the votes. I did notice that one user submitted their ballot without selecting any candidates. A commentary on the perceived quality of the candidates?
__________________
Nokia 770 Internet Tablet = best device ever made

Deuteronomy 13:6-10; 2 Kings 2:23-24; Judges 19:22-29
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25.