Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 266 | Thanked: 83 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#1
Does the N900 play Xvid files that are quiet large without reencoding? DVD resolution size with high quality stream size for example.

Those files that are adapted to fit a 700 mb cd for example.

Raptor

Last edited by eikido; 2009-10-07 at 08:42.
 
Posts: 156 | Thanked: 239 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Finland
#2
I'd imagine it should play them just fine. I think I read somewhere that people have played 720p h.264 movies with it, so standard mpeg4 asp (which XviD technically is) shouldn't be a problem.
 
Posts: 85 | Thanked: 12 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#3
Does it support subtitles and all the fancy stuff like that?
 
Posts: 150 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Madrid, Spain
#4
Originally Posted by remister View Post
Does it support subtitles and all the fancy stuff like that?
I'm sure some kind of APP will allow subtites. It shouldn't be too difficult, should it?
 
claesbas's Avatar
Posts: 290 | Thanked: 472 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Gothenburg, Sweden
#5
Originally Posted by remister View Post
Does it support subtitles and all the fancy stuff like that?
With mplayer on my N810 I have beautiful subtitles now. It will be there on the n900 too..
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to claesbas For This Useful Post:
Capt'n Corrupt's Avatar
Posts: 3,524 | Thanked: 2,958 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Delta Quadrant
#6
Originally Posted by claesbas View Post
With mplayer on my N810 I have beautiful subtitles now. It will be there on the n900 too..
Second!

The N8x0 already handles 700mb rips quite well. So long as the action isn't too heavy w/ variable bit rate, they play wonderfully. I suspect that the N900 will chew through them. Also with optimization (using the DSP/shaders for calculations etc), we may further see higher resolutions still.

I should note that I think very high res video, like 1080p playback on handhelds is not terribly useful. When you consider the file-size of a video at 1080p and the length of time it would take to transfer, it doesn't make a lot of sense.

In this same chain of reasoning, 1080p outs for video are a little ridiculous right now. Of course, 1080p outs for other content could still be cool, but based on the res, perhaps not terribly useful in real world either.

As transfer speeds improve (lightpeak?) and storage size increases, 1080p video will find relevance on handhelds. Until then, it's a novelty at best.

I think Nokia's video res targets and composite outs are right-on-the-money.

Wow, that was off on a tangent....

}:^)~
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post:
Posts: 54 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#7
I agree. Also, the difference between SD, 720P, and 1080P is going to be less distinct and significant on a 3.5" screen than on a 60" screen.
 
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#8
Originally Posted by liveslow View Post
I agree. Also, the difference between SD, 720P, and 1080P is going to be less distinct and significant on a 3.5" screen than on a 60" screen.
That plus there's only 480 physical vertical lines to play with anyway.
 
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#9
Not having to convert divx and xvid 700meg rips will be sweet
 
Corwin_bg's Avatar
Posts: 29 | Thanked: 13 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Bulgaria
#10
Originally Posted by Rushmore View Post
Not having to convert divx and xvid 700meg rips will be sweet
That's true, but I prefer to transcode the videos for the obvious reasons - smaller size, embedded subtitles (if needed), better battery life (presumably).

Also, transcoding is bound to get very fast soon with OpenCL/CUDA becoming more mature and gaining popularity. Not to mention the regular advances in CPU technology.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13.