![]() |
2009-10-19
, 05:01
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#22
|
"AT&T’s wireless unit, Verizon, T-Mobile USA and Sprint Nextel [t]ogether ... control 96 percent of United States sales of mobile devices ... "
"In Europe, a competitive marketplace with more than 230 operators, Nokia could always find one or more operators in every domestic market willing to sell its portfolio of phones."
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 05:54
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Somerville MA - USA
|
#23
|
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 09:47
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#24
|
The most interesting point in the article to me:
"AT&T’s wireless unit, Verizon, T-Mobile USA and Sprint Nextel [t]ogether ... control 96 percent of United States sales of mobile devices ... "
"In Europe, a competitive marketplace with more than 230 operators, Nokia could always find one or more operators in every domestic market willing to sell its portfolio of phones.
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 09:59
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#25
|
btw, have anyone else noticed that the real mobile action is in africa, south asia and eastern europe? all areas where there is no big legacy installations of wired networks, be their phone or otherwise?
hell, didnt nokia launch a payment system for their S40 phones specifically aimed at african nations?
|
2009-10-19
, 11:31
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#26
|
US citizens have been conditioned to think no more than a few weeks ahead at a given time. Many succumb to this, which works to the advantage of carriers who subsidize.
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 13:29
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ MA-US
|
#27
|
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 13:55
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#28
|
Right
And still the journalist doesn't get it. The point is not that there are enough operators that a few of them will accept to sell Nokia phones, the point is that you just go to any shop (or netshop or anywhere) and just buy the d**n thing. In the GSM market, particularly with the governmental restrictions on how much you can be locked in, it's a consumer choice if you want a particular contract or not.
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 14:06
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#29
|
Wait... let me play devil's advocate for a moment.
Anybody care to show me how an unlocked phone is actually cheaper to own? I've brought my own phone to the table before and I didn't receive any price cuts on my service. I was just able to use the phone I had wanted to use instead.
Subsidization isn't an evil where it costs you more down the line in the USA. So... where are these savings? You pay more for the phone unsubsidized and you end up paying the same for the same coverage as a person with a subsidized phone. If there's a difference - not the oft-rumored Project Black/Dark from T-Mobile, that's not announced fully yet - then show me please.
Proof, not opinion. I'm honestly curious, no scoffing needed.
![]() |
2009-10-19
, 18:41
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#30
|
"AT&T’s wireless unit, Verizon, T-Mobile USA and Sprint Nextel [t]ogether ... control 96 percent of United States sales of mobile devices ... "
"In Europe, a competitive marketplace with more than 230 operators, Nokia could always find one or more operators in every domestic market willing to sell its portfolio of phones.
"But in the United States, where a small number of operators rule most of the market, the network companies can command design changes to promote and sell their own wireless services. They place their own brand names on every model they sell and make sure their revenue-raising wireless services are prominently displayed and easy to use."
In other words, Nokia is used to playing in a competitive marketplace, not in the oligopoly of the supposed Land of Free Market Competition.