![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:20
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#82
|
Nope. Patents and trade secrets help produce things, but they're not required (see also, generic drugs).
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:21
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#83
|
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:21
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#84
|
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:22
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#85
|
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:23
|
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 32 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ USA
|
#86
|
I think you misunderstand. Go back to the later post where I included links; the second link references what I mean.
(oh, and I won't be confusing any IP protection mechanisms-- I'm well-versed in all of them)
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:24
|
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 32 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ USA
|
#87
|
Buzz! Poor example. Many if not most generic drugs start off as patented.
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:24
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#88
|
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:26
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#89
|
This one:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...9&pageNumber=1
?
Regarding you confusing patents and trademarks: it's a common error I've seen, and I don't know you from Adam. You can assert whatever you want about yourself, and I have little ability to verify it. Hence, I take a prove-it stance.
![]() |
2009-10-22
, 19:27
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#90
|
I see your point, although it's entirely open to debate (would the drug exist in the absence of patents isn't a settled question by any means)
How about a chair? Basic, wooden chair that's existed since the dawn of time.
![]() |
Tags |
apple, intellectual property, lawsuit, nokia, nonsense magnet, patent infringement |
|
Copyrights are another kettle of fish altogether, and, as with patents, can both help and hinder.
But products have been made and sold since the beginning of time, with and without patents, trademarks, salesmarks, copyright, etc. (Trade secrets are kinda different because they'd exist with or without government intervention in the free market).
And you must also prove that patents and copyrights being sold as a product, in the form they are right now, is actually beneficial to society. IMHO, they're currently detrimental to progress. I'd like to think that giving up our rights (which is what we do to provide copyright and patents) should give us back something, not stop progress.
--
Umm, what?