c0rt3x
|
2009-10-25
, 10:07
|
Posts: 367 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#11
|
The Following User Says Thank You to c0rt3x For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-25
, 10:09
|
Posts: 13 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Canada
|
#12
|
The N97 isn't even better than the almost 3 year old N95 hardware wise. Let's put the N95's GPU advantage aside, and we'll still be able see how poor the N97 compares.
First off, the N95 8GB and the N97 both have the same amount of RAM, while the N97 has much more pixels to display on the screen. Of course S60v5 is better optimized for power use per pixel than S60v3, but that isn't enough.
Secondly, the N95 had a dual-CPU architecture, and despite the higher clock frequency, the N97 with its single-CPU can't compare with the N95's multi-tasking and overall performance. Now it's unfair to say that the N95's CPU was dual-core, as it wasn't, kind of. One of the cores was solely used for communication data, while the other was "free" to do all the other stuff. On the N97, the slightly more powerful single-CPU has to do all that alone, which often leads to slower performance.
Last but not least, the N95 had an impressive GPU, while the N97 completely lacked it.
|
2009-10-25
, 10:28
|
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 70 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Tampere, Finland
|
#13
|
|
2009-10-25
, 12:15
|
|
Posts: 383 |
Thanked: 209 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London UK
|
#14
|
Another thing worth mentioning is that the vast majority of the new people to Maemo won't visit Maemo Talk at all, which means it won't be noticed here.
|
2009-10-25
, 12:34
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#15
|
|
2009-10-25
, 16:06
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#16
|
The Following User Says Thank You to christexaport For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-25
, 16:20
|
Posts: 352 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Vancouver
|
#17
|
The Following User Says Thank You to timwatt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-26
, 03:05
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Sydney, Aus
|
#18
|
|
2009-10-26
, 03:38
|
Posts: 1,067 |
Thanked: 313 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ USA
|
#19
|
|
2009-10-26
, 10:18
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#20
|
It is not a marketing concern at all. Nokia have an expected inventory of Simbian phone for years to come (and Laggards who will buy those phones) Symbian being the bread and butter OS allows Nokia to take there time to perfect there Maemo phone. The early adopter crowd "us" know there is no other phone on the market like this so are prepared to wait. So i agree with Nokia get it right, a flop is not an option and well being in the market 3 weeks early with a buggy product, can jeopardize its success. so wait.