Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 268 | Thanked: 304 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Orlando, USA
#61
[QUOTE=fcukwaiting;359342] I'm through with being treated like an idiot.
/QUOTE]

A few months down the road, I hope you don't feel like one for passing on the N900 in your frustration.

farewell
 
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#62
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
I hope this is clear to everybody. I wish I had the time to find Peter's post here now
Here, posted on 10-22-09 , 10:31 AM. Whatever else you read elsewhere started from this Talk reply addressed to maemo.org members.

, but shouldn't be difficult to dig it out.
1. http://talk.maemo.org/search.php
2. Search by User Name - Peter@Maemo Marketing
3. Show Results as Posts
4. Search now
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
Posts: 521 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#63
You have to also understand the frustration that's been building up since the release of the "flagship" N97.

Took over 6 months from announcement and the phone was buggy and unstable, expensive with 2 year old hardware. Pretty much burnt everyone except for the most hardcore fanboy.

The frustration level was already pretty high and Nokia fans were at hoping at least for better communication this time...
 
Posts: 171 | Thanked: 35 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#64
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
The frustration level was already pretty high and Nokia fans were at hoping at least for better communication this time...
I doubt Nokia will come up with "Oh we have the N900 ready, it's the same as the N97: will be delayed 6 months, will work like a trash bin but we will announce one week later a much better phone with Maemo 6 - the New Communicator?"

Does the N97 really sucks so bad?
 
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#65
Well, if we extrapolate the level some are upset about a one month (I hope) delay, imagine how upset they would have been if Nokia released the N900 with the bugs they are fixing now.

Nokia loses in their minds either way. Best to get it as right as possible before releasing to the public.
 
Posts: 171 | Thanked: 35 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#66
There is no way that Nokia could handle this situation without upsetting no one.
If they not announced the N900 it would be dead just before launch, cause it is a open source phone.

The only thing I would recommened is, that they pushed the date back when taking pre-orders.
I think it's clear, that there will be some feedback when Nokia gives away 300 N900 for testing and start making programs.

I hope this device will not fail and all crybabies will crush the phone they bought instead of the N900 because they were just fed up waiting.
 
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#67
Seems the main issue was the memory correction. This takes time to roll out to hundreds of thousands of phones, or in the case of a first batch, thousands.

Factor in Nokia is trying to not only make the techs happy, Nokia has to make this device more "consumer friendly" ready for shipment.

Bad impressions would hurt the device and potential deals with Tmo or other potential carriers. If I go by Tmo management chatter (perhaps noise?), Tmo may be waiting on a more phone centric interface to be developed before considering adding the device to their portfolio.

One final and respectful (always) time, techs are the minority of the total population that will buy the N900. A lot of people are planning on replacing their current smart phones with the N900.

Last edited by Rushmore; 2009-10-28 at 12:36. Reason: lack of sleep
 
Posts: 171 | Thanked: 35 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#68
Originally Posted by Rushmore View Post
Bad impressions would hurt the device and potential deals with Tmo or other potential carriers. If I go by Tmo management chatter (perhaps noise?), Tmo may be waiting on a more phone centric interface to be developed before considering adding the device to their portfolio.
T-Mobile Germany offers the Nokia N900 if you ask for it.

Otherwise doesn't sounds soo good. But read for yourselfs

Telefon-Treff.de - T-Mobile offers N900
 
anidel's Avatar
Posts: 1,743 | Thanked: 1,231 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Twickenham, UK
#69
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Good point Rushmore.

Perhaps video advertisements should start off demonstrating all the computer-oriented stuff, and at the end the narrator intones, "Oh yeah, it's a phone too..." and then the phone features are showed off.
Isn't that what the N900 official ad video does?
In the end you get a call.. reminding you that, yeah, unfortunately, it's also a phone
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anidel For This Useful Post:
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ München, DE
#70
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
About "Delay upon delay", I hope it's clear that first it was announced October and last week it was said November. That's it.
Tell that to the diverse "shop.nokia.*" - afaics shop.nokia.de now has the *fourth* date (well, always saying "probably") on their page.

So yes, I can understand why people see a "delay after delay after delay".

Because how much more official than a date on Nokia's logistic pages can a release date be - at least in the eyes of the consumers?

I know that other stores did not do that but just stated "october" and then "november" without specific dates attached.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to range For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19.