Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 60 | Thanked: 59 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#41
Isn't this Nokia patent all about what are you talking?
 
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#42
Originally Posted by leeyam View Post
quick preface - I'm inclined to agree with you that there will not be multitouch for the N900, but I'd like to see the idea definitively debunked, through a teardown of the HW (call me a sceptic of sceptics, if you like).
ragnar works for Nokia, so I assume he knows what he's talking about.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post:
Posts: 235 | Thanked: 89 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ italy
#43
@leeyam: quote!! I like your post!

@javispedro: simply...it's possible! (ok 95% not, 5% yes! do you like it?)
Why do you talk about royalties? do you know how much pay Nokia to Stantum? Do you know in Big Companies (Corporation) royalties maybe not expansive because smeared on millions of items and for years? Do you know for electronic minimum royalty is 0.5% (average 4.3%) (ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royalties) so this means about €2,5 min (€21,5 average) on €500 (european cost) for each N900? Do you know Stantum is a little company (http://www.stantum.com/en/about/history-highlights) and Nokia is number one in the world on mobile communication? Do you know what this means?
so...how leeyam says: what else are we supposed to do while we wait for the device? talk about it *without* superstition, faith and mysticism??
 
Posts: 235 | Thanked: 89 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ italy
#44
Originally Posted by Ignacius View Post
Isn't this Nokia patent all about what are you talking?
WOWOWOW! I didn't know that. Produced by Nokia itself... So... now it's more possible...
Thank you Ignacius
 
chemist's Avatar
Administrator | Posts: 1,036 | Thanked: 2,019 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Germany
#45
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
I don't think you guys understand how development works. This close to release is way way to late to change hardware in a device.
this close to release? rumors said week 40 then 44 then 46... we are on week 45 now... and believe me there were serious changes to whole production lines in the past just before release, think thats not the case here, but the camera for example is just a plug-in-chip, recognize that you had 10000 wrong cam chips gets a delay of at least 2 weeks!
Having a manufacturer missing one line on a connector another 2 weeks... its just 10 business-days!
I guess replacing the display at this point is still possible but truly not expected. maybe they found non RoHS compliant parts because some freaking china-fab didn't bother...
sometimes even big companies screw up big time

there are that many reasons 'what?' could happen to delay shippings, I cant even describe all! (I work for an analytical research institute and have knowledge of some serious issues over the last 3 years... from ironing to chip-bonding with 'we have a problem in our manufacturing line please give us results till end of this week no matter what!')
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#46
Originally Posted by maemo.it View Post
Do you know what this means?
What I know is that cuts in the hw design than would amount to 0,01€ per shipped device are not uncommon at all.

So, talk as you wish, but there's no Stantum screen.
 
Posts: 11 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Sydney, Aus
#47
Does anyone know whether Stantum tech requires a specific type of screen or associated HW? ie would it be possible if a sufficiently accurate resistive touch panel was manufactured that just happened to meet stantum spec, if driver (or the equiv) updates to firmware / software could implement the tech later?

This is not something that I am going to suggest about the n900, but in the interests of learning more about the tech in general, I think it would be good if someone could clear this up!

My take (I am an interested consumer only - NO industry level knowledge) is that Stantum tech requires a touchpanel of certain quality/resolution, but doesn't need to be in any way fundamentally different from the standard touch tech. However I don't know if a specific HW level chip is needed or whether the interpretation of the input can be done at a firm/software level or not...
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#48
Hey, looking at the size and thickness of the N900 I think it's impossible that they make out all that space (LOOK AT THE THICKNESS) without a DVB tuner + mobile inside.

Someone needs to prove me wrong by showing the disassembled pictures of N900, otherwise I'm sure it's a hidden feature.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 
Posts: 235 | Thanked: 89 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ italy
#49
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
Hey, looking at the size and thickness of the N900 I think it's impossible that they make out all that space (LOOK AT THE THICKNESS) without a DVB tuner + mobile inside.

Someone needs to prove me wrong by showing the disassembled pictures of N900, otherwise I'm sure it's a hidden feature.
very interesting question ysss!!
Thinking about what you posted...I think it's possible that! Like you, I hope to see some pictures of N900 disassembled
 
Posts: 329 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#50
Irony is even more fun when you see other people not understanding
__________________
I don't mean to crush your hopes, I just can't help it
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:48.