Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 90 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Sep 2006 @ Bucuresti, Romania
#11
I've tested this on a couple of iPhones, got from 44 fps (iPhone 2G, OS 3.1.2) to 87 ! (iPhone 3GS).

Desktop results around my testing vary from 64 fps on Firefox 3.5.4 and 65 fps on IExplorer 8.0.7600 to 228 fps Chrome 4.0.223 and 250 fps Chrome 3.0.195.27, all on the same Lenovo T61p with Windows 7.

It's quite impressive for an handheld ARM WebKit device to get better javascript performance than Firefox on a dual core x86 machine. Safari on MacBookPros got from 88 to 98 depending on the exact hardware.

This shows that impressive performance of Javascript on ARM is possible, and that Safari is better tuned on mobile devices than Mozilla.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ddalex For This Useful Post:
Posts: 47 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#12
Nokia N95 8Gb. v31.0.015 firmware. Gets around 22-24fps
 
Posts: 13 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ BG, Ruse
#13
On my jailbroken iphone 3G 3.0 it varies from 50 to 70fps.

On my desktop PC Win7 7100, Google Chrome 3.0.195....- it plays at 250fps rock solid.
 
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#14
HTC G1, Android 1.6, using Steel (webkit). Started slow, finally maxed out at 44-52 fps. I was surprised it did that well.
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#15
tear 0.3.5 on N800 (5.2008.43-7) hit 96 once all the bricks where removed.
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post:
Posts: 183 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ italy
#16
yea that's impressive i was testing it right now!! have a medium of 90 with a hit to 98!!!!

WOW!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pinguino89 For This Useful Post:
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#17
The best I got on my N810, OS2008 43.7 was 32 fps on a BT connection through 19.2 Kbps GPRS.

The funny thing is that the best I could get was 29 fps connected on WiFi over a 3Mbps cable modem...

Go figure.

And I saw no diff with or without bricks...

@ tso, what was tear 0.3.5's average performance?


BTW, IE8 on Win7 @ 64 fps

Last edited by YoDude; 2009-11-04 at 13:07.
 
Posts: 323 | Thanked: 180 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Gent, Belgium
#18
from the 2 dinosaurs in my pocket :

Nokia E61, Ozone browser : 15 to 27 fps. Compared to a Hero, a 5 year younger machine, not too bad

HTC Touch pro (WM 6.5 23xxx series), Iris browser, 10 to 15 fps. : Disappointing ...

HTC Touch pro (WM 6.5 23xxx series), standard IE, 2 fps.

Please N900, come quick. I want to get rid of at least one of these dinosaurs

Unfortunately, as I can only be on Three in the UK (no fixed addres), I'll have to run around (hopefully for a short time) with 3 phones
 
Posts: 674 | Thanked: 191 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Buenos Aires, Argentina
#19
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
@ tso, what was tear 0.3.5's average performance?
On my N810 with Tear, I got 60 FPS average.
 
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#20
I re-ran the test with my N800/OS2007/330MHz/Opera setup: The speed seems to depend on how many bricks there are left. It starts out at an average of 30 (as reported before), then it steadily increases until there are no bricks left. At that point it hovers between 39 and 41.

On my desktop the number of bricks don't matter, it's steady at 95 all the time. But then again it doesn't use any CPU either. Presumably it's all limited by the graphics card there.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.

Last edited by TA-t3; 2009-11-04 at 14:16.
 
Reply

Tags
performance javascript


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:05.