Active Topics

 


Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Reply
Thread Tools
Thor is offline Thor
2009-11-11 , 17:02
Posts: 488 | Thanked: 107 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Asgard / Midgard / London
#31
Originally Posted by christexaport View Post
Then you need to catch up with the times. The iPhone saved Apple. They'll never command more then 15% of the PC market, no matter what they do. The iPod business has declined, and will probably be discontinued soon. Mobile is the center of the technology planet at the moment. Cellphones have surpassed PCs for the largest installed base. This isn't the future, mobile is NOW!
I think Apple themselves have admitted that the iPod sales were dwindling mainly due to mobile phones being able to play MP3 files, which brought them into the mobile phone market and their huge profits. The app store took a long time to appear and was by popular demand, so that was another stroke of luck for them.

Originally Posted by christexaport View Post
Web based apps and services are the future, as Tomi Ahonen and other visionaries have continuously reminded us. Whoever has the best web browser on device has a better chance of surviving any OS battle in the marketplace. Supporting the most popular services is just as important, and supporting services other than those you own or promote will only make the offering more attractive. Apple can't continue to rest on its music store laurels, with Amazon, Google, and Nokia coming to play as well, and Last.FM, Pandora, and other streaming services getting more popular every day.
Agreed.

Originally Posted by christexaport View Post
Take a look at BMW and Mercedes. They're both companies only positioned in the high end, making profits of scale hard to see. Meanwhile, Audi, Caddillac, Lexus, Infinity, and Lincoln have good futures ahead because of the mass market partners there to cover them in times of loss. So the same with RIM and Nokia, who have diversified their device portfolios to weather economic storms and appeal to more people. I'd rather be RIM or Nokia than Apple in this regard.
I don't know about American cars as they aren't very popular in Europe, but Lexus is owned by Toyota who fit your profile perfectly. Audi also have their fingers in different pies, the high end is Lamborghini, for VW it's Bugatti, and for Fiat it's Ferrari, for example.
__________________
London Tube Map App

Brainstorm: Improving the N900 Media Player
Last edited by Thor; 2009-11-11 at 17:05.
 
daperl's Avatar
daperl is offline daperl
2009-11-11 , 17:29
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#32
Originally Posted by Relativistic View Post
Apple hit the jackpot when they introduced an simple, easy to use smartphone at the exact right time. And having everyone believe it was a bargain at "$199" (really, if you add the subsidized cost Apple makes $600+ per iPhone).
This would be cool if it were true. But when introduced, the iPhone was unsubsidized for a year @ $599. I can't remember, was it a failure that first year?

It's just a toy though, nothing else.
You don't know what you're talking about. That also goes for other things you said in your thread but your blinded-by-hate inaccuracies are as boring as they are annoying. Get a new tune or next time I won't be so nice.

Apple = marketing gods
Hey, you finally made a true statement!
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 

The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
cb474 is offline cb474
2009-11-12 , 03:05
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#33
Originally Posted by mrojas View Post
Originally Posted by cb474
2) The article points out that because of the popularity of the iPhone in the U.S., the U.S. has become the major source of cell phone applications. Hence even though the U.S. has traditionally not been one of the most important cell phone markets, it now has disproportionate influence over the direction cell phone development is heading in. If you want your app market to take off, you need a platform that's popular in the U.S. Again, Android will only compound this problem for Nokia.
This point makes the implicit assumption that US market is equal to the global market, and what happens in the US market will happen elsewhere.

Wrong assumption. Sometimes I want to scream to the media: "WAKE UP!!! DO SOME RESEARCH ON OTHER MARKETS THAN YOURS AND STOP ASSUMING EVERYTHING HAPPENS EVERYWHERE THE SAME WAY THAN IN THE US!!!"
Okay, I explicitly said in the very words from my post that you quote that the U.S. traditionally has not been the most important cell phone market. So I don't know how you come to the conclusion that I'm implicity assuming that the U.S. drives the global cell phone market. I'm just trying to look at the actual situation that has actually come to pass, rather than taking some sort of ideological stance for or against the U.S. (or any place else, for that matter).

Here's what the Business Week article said in full on this point:

Nokia's big disadvantage, though, is one that Maemo won't quickly fix. Largely because of the iPhone, the U.S. has become the world's app incubator. The N900 will be available in North America, but Nokia's weak market position there means many developers don't bother writing apps for the company's products. "All the major buzz around developers is in the U.S.," says Strategy Analytics' Mawston. "With Nokia not having a presence there, they're not getting on the radar screens of the most important developers."
It didn't have to be this way. There's no "implicit" or "natural" force driving things to be this way. But by accident of the iPhones massive popularity, which has completely changed the cell phone market (everyone is coming out with large, touch screen driven, more desktop like phones now) and by accident of the equally massive popularity of the Apple app store and the money that can be made from it, developers have gravitated there. The phenomenon exploded in the U.S. and for better or worse, the U.S. has suddenly moved from being one of the less important cell phone markets to the center of stage. The growth of Android, which is supposed to pass Apple in the next couple years, will only further compound this effect.

It seems like every time someone makes an analysis of the market situation and the forces that are driving it, which acknowledges how much influence the U.S. can have on it, people get offended because they assume it's some kind of U.S. cheerleading. I'm not recommending or defending what's happened. I'm just trying to think about the actual dynamics.

Originally Posted by mrojas
There are many other customers and markets that prefer to get good bang for their buck... and that need a mobile device, not as a fashion statement, but as critical asset for their life. Just check the work Nokia is doing in India. Its because of things like that, Nokia deserves my utmost respect for what they do as a global citizen. And in my opinion that is far more important than plain profits.
The idea that Nokia is somehow more virtuous or a good "global citizen" is deeply naive. When it comes down to it, it's not about number of handsets sold and it's not about population size and it's now about geographic area covered. It's about money. Nokia cares about nothing more than the bottom line, just as much as Apple. If Nokia engages in some sort of project like Nokia Life Tools, in India, to "empower" people in argriculture, that's just pure PR. They're trying to make people so hooked into and used to their products that they become indispensible. This is no different froom Apple giving educational discounts on their products to students at universities. Get to people early and young, get them hooked. Frankly, I think the insidiousness of the PR side of marketing is even more loathsome than straight forward advertising, precisely because people are duped into thinking huge corporations actually care about people. It's perverse.

And in the end even if Nokia wanted to be virtuous, purely out of the goodness of its corporate heart, they would still be effected by the forces that drive the market. Once everyone starts wanting a large touchscreen driven phone, iPhone or not, once everyone is hooked into the app store phenomenon, Nokia has to respond and follow the trends or they'll lose market share to those who do (HTC, Android, iPhone, Palm, whoever) and become irrelevant. So that's why what's happened with the iPhone effects everyone, for better or worse. I'm not endorsing this, I'm just trying to analyze it.
 
cb474 is offline cb474
2009-11-12 , 03:24
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#34
Originally Posted by christexaport View Post
Something lost in all of this is how unsound Apple's iPhone business position really is. Apple to too heavily hedged in the US with 40% of its sales in America. They are also heavily hedged in the high end. We've seen what an economic turndown can do to high end real estate. The same could happen to Apple once their midrange pricing advantage via subsidy ends, and people are less willing to spend $350 on an iPhone on contract.
I'm willing to buy that Apple's strategy my have long term vulnerabilities. But it's a little hard to see how you come to the conclusion that an economic downturn will effect them badly, as a high end product company. First of all, the high end products actually tend to be effected the least in downturns, because the people with the most money are least effected by downturns and can keep spending. Secondly, the actual reality right now in the worst economic crisis in decades it that Apple is having record profits. It seems like reality belies whatever argument one might want to make about it.

I think Apple's future as a high end product manufactuere with a niche (albeit a pretty large and hugely profitable one) will depend on it's ability to continue to innovate and stay ahead of the curve. Apple has profited from taking ideas, putting them together in a newly appealing way, and doing it first. Let's not forget that it was Apple that popularized the graphical mouse driven desktop, with multi-tasking. Of course, it's a lot of pressure to keep pulling these kind of innovations off. And Apple has had some flops, for sure. And whether or not Apple will survive someday without Steve Jobs seems like a big question too.

Originally Posted by christexaport
Web based apps and services are the future, as Tomi Ahonen and other visionaries have continuously reminded us. Whoever has the best web browser on device has a better chance of surviving any OS battle in the marketplace. Supporting the most popular services is just as important, and supporting services other than those you own or promote will only make the offering more attractive. Apple can't continue to rest on its music store laurels, with Amazon, Google, and Nokia coming to play as well, and Last.FM, Pandora, and other streaming services getting more popular every day.
Yes, this is why I think Google/Android is the one to beat. Google whole business is built around highly integrated, well designed, web based apps and services. Add to that Chrome and Android, and giving the platform away for free, and it just hard to see others keeping up. Google has such a huge head start.
 
bandora's Avatar
bandora is offline bandora
2009-11-12 , 03:26
Posts: 1,338 | Thanked: 1,055 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ California, USA / Jordan
#35
I want to see Apple's "Profit" off of the iPhone when it loses exclusitivity from AT&T..
 
cb474 is offline cb474
2009-11-12 , 09:11
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#36
Originally Posted by bandora View Post
I want to see Apple's "Profit" off of the iPhone when it loses exclusitivity from AT&T..
Won't that benefit Apple and hurt AT&T? Isn't it AT&T that has exclusivity with Apple, not the other way around?

It seems like Apple benefited from exclusivity with AT&T to begin with, as a means for launching the iPhone. But now that everyone is clamoring for the iPhone, the end of the AT&T's exclusivity deal will only open the floodgates for Apple.

To me the only possible concern for Apple, as christexaport suggested, is that other carriers and AT&T themselves might not continue to subsidize the iPhone at the same rate. But I don't really see why they wouldn't, since the iPhone has been the most effective device ever and drawing in the most lucrative customers, who pay for the relatively expensive data plans and other services.
 
DaveP1 is offline DaveP1
2009-11-12 , 15:58
Posts: 607 | Thanked: 450 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC
#37
Originally Posted by cb474 View Post
Yes, this is why I think Google/Android is the one to beat. Google whole business is built around highly integrated, well designed, web based apps and services. Add to that Chrome and Android, and giving the platform away for free, and it just hard to see others keeping up. Google has such a huge head start.
I think you are right for this year. However, as processor power increases it becomes more and more feasible to run full browsers on a smartphone. At that point, it could become a Safari vs. Chrome vs. Firefox battle. The first smartphone that can implement this will take the lead (and I have high hopes for the N1000/Maemo 6 platform).

Still, Google doesn't care. As long as the smartphones are ending up at a Google web app, they make their advertising money. Android is just a strategy to force the smartphone market to make working in the cloud an expected feature of all smartphones.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to DaveP1 For This Useful Post:
cb474 is offline cb474
2009-11-13 , 00:31
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#38
Originally Posted by DaveP1 View Post
I think you are right for this year. However, as processor power increases it becomes more and more feasible to run full browsers on a smartphone. At that point, it could become a Safari vs. Chrome vs. Firefox battle. The first smartphone that can implement this will take the lead (and I have high hopes for the N1000/Maemo 6 platform).

Still, Google doesn't care. As long as the smartphones are ending up at a Google web app, they make their advertising money. Android is just a strategy to force the smartphone market to make working in the cloud an expected feature of all smartphones.
Yeah, those are good points. I would certainly love to see Maemo end up winning that battle (and hopefully maintaining it's more open source orientation). Although, as you point out, Google wins either way, which is why their strategy is so formidable.

On the other hand, I'm not entirely convinced that people want to reproduce the desktop experience, as is, on the mobile devices. It struck me recently that one of the reasons netbooks are so popular is not simply because they're inexpensive and very portable, but because they essentially have simplified the desktop (a little bit in the direction of platforms like Android, iPhone, WebOS, Maemo). I think people like the simplification. Interacting with the cloud through a web browser is kind of a mess. There are too many non-integrated options right now. It's confusing and a barrier to entry, for a lot of less sophisticated users. Interacting through a single portal, be that a website or a set of device integrated applictions, makes things easier for a lot of people. In this regard, a mobile OS that is highly integrated across applications and in the could, so that the distinction between browswer and desktop/OS is completely seamless, I think might be the most appealing thing to the mass market. Ironically, this was originally Microsoft's vision, until they got sued (for anti-competitive reasons) out of too deeply integrating Internet Explorer into the desktop.

In this regard, I found this video of Nokia's vision of mobile technology in 2015 really interesting:

http://www.slashgear.com/nokia-visio...video-1163237/

It's a vision of an extremely cloud/desktop integrated interaction with the world. I just couldn't help feeling everytime they say "Nokia" in that video, if they just substituted "Google," it would be believable. I don't see anything in Nokia's service and app portfolio right now that remotely suggests they could pull this off, whereas Google is already there in some ways. How is Nokia going to catch up? Do they really have the resources and developers to compete with Google in the cloud/desktop? Maemo is amazing and very forwad looking as a platform. But Nokia's cloud services are a bit lackluster.
 
matikjn is offline matikjn
2009-11-13 , 00:54
Posts: 37 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ UK
#39
I don't know if Nokia can reach 300m service users they apparently want by 2011, but they are an innovative company so wouldn't write them off.

They have some interesting open source projects that link to web services like their mapreduce implementation (http://discoproject.org/) and I'm sure other closed stuff going on at their research centre.
 
mrojas's Avatar
mrojas is offline mrojas
2009-11-13 , 01:07
Posts: 733 | Thanked: 991 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#40
Originally Posted by cb474 View Post
The idea that Nokia is somehow more virtuous or a good "global citizen" is deeply naive. etc etc
Dude, every corporation is out there to make money (and I don't see why that makes a corporation automatically evil), but there are many ways to do it, and always a difference. Maybe in your words, it could be said that Nokia is "less evil" than Apple.

However, when I go to the highlands of my country, where people still starve to death daily, and I see a cell phone tower with a ground station, that the people use to call outside, and coordinate the shipments of food and medicine, and when I climb said tower to discover that it was donated by Nokia, then yeah, my respect for them grows a lot.

Edit: Oh, and if you are wondering why I was there in the first place, well, the corporation where I work donated 10% of our quarter quota for us to go there and help with the relief work, and we were forbidden of doing any publicity about it. So yeah, all corporations are evil, right?
__________________
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.

Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
Last edited by mrojas; 2009-11-13 at 01:13.
 
Reply
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:47.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top