The Following User Says Thank You to tekojo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-05
, 08:52
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#22
|
We still don't have sources for modified uclibc used in N8x0 initfs :-)
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-05
, 12:05
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#23
|
For good measure, I think we can scrap the 'modified' part.. I'm still getting more and more sure it's a couple of revisions ahead of 0.9.28 release of uclibc in their public SVN. The tarballs I've found has no differences at all to that SVN revision. Can someone check if the uclibc then matches initfs so we can get the issue out of the world?
![]() |
2009-11-16
, 06:11
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#24
|
The Following User Says Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-16
, 21:49
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#25
|
![]() |
2009-11-19
, 19:11
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Finland
|
#26
|
![]() |
2009-11-19
, 22:21
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#27
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fanoush For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-25
, 22:00
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Finland
|
#28
|
![]() |
2009-12-06
, 12:06
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Finland
|
#29
|
![]() |
2009-12-13
, 17:44
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Sheffield
|
#30
|
True, in practice it's pretty hard to do.
The uclibc is a really bad case. Need to see if something can be done. At least Stskeeps started digging at it again (I'm happy to have someone with a mandate and time to take on these things :-) ).