Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 21 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#41
Originally Posted by andybehr View Post
I think the time of expensive apps is pretty much over.

GPS Navigation being the last stronghold (70-90 Euros). But even here we see changes. Google Navigation is already free and caused a drop in the GPS makes stock prices. It would be easy for Nokia to provide free turn-by-turn navigation since they own Navteq!

One thing the Apple app store showed, cheap software can still make you rich. Yes I know, it does not really work for the Android market right now, but I believe that to be a technical and an marketing issue with the marketplace app.

One last thought: Why do you think there won't be pirated software for the N900? Look at the N810 and the navigation add-on for Maps.
+1

The GPS stronghold is slowly disappearing. Google Maps on Android does what most people would want now, and don't forget open streetmap :

http://www.openstreetmap.org/

Which is totally free, and has the community updating the maps. I've checked a few local places, and its considerably more up to date than google maps.
 
Posts: 316 | Thanked: 150 times | Joined on May 2006
#42
Originally Posted by agogo View Post
this means commercial applications will need to be extremely good to stand out.
That is exactly the way it should be - pay for quality, not cheap tat fart apps.
 
chemist's Avatar
Administrator | Posts: 1,036 | Thanked: 2,019 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Germany
#43
Would you mind to change the thread's name, please?

I'm some kind of offended reading it.

All this deal-breaker stuff keeps me laughing as this system and the new device with it are a deal-breaker, they break the piracy deal. Where no lock there no picker! If something is good I want to pay for it even if its 'only' a donation.

There is no lack of pirated software as there is no need for it. Emulators are not a pirated good, the ROMs are and those you wont find in any OSS repository.

If you are still concerned, ask nokia for a software lock down to get a jailed device again. But believe me, you will have assassins after you and they dont even want to get paid for it.
 
Posts: 68 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#44
Originally Posted by chemist View Post
Would you mind to change the thread's name, please?

I'm some kind of offended reading it.
Ive tried to change it, lets see if moderators allow it.
 
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#45
I would be happy to pay for apps, but they have to be there to buy. I knew there would be limited selection, but I did not anticipate it being as limited as it is. I did not realized the dev community was as small as it is. Great people, but still kind of small, if we extrapolate based on what is currently available.

As far as games, Android would suck after one year, but has arcade and console emulators that are the best I have seen. Still, that is only three people doing them. If the emulators were not there, Android would really suck- if you like games.

Then again, the problem with Android is the lack of app space. Maemo 5 is due to lack of time and apps & games will come. I hope.

Last edited by Rushmore; 2009-12-01 at 13:06.
 
dantonic's Avatar
Posts: 361 | Thanked: 108 times | Joined on Sep 2008
#46
I'm reading all these comments implying that "poor" people from other countries should have the ability to pirate because they cannot afford to purchase the software...

Putting aside the argument about how affordable apps would be... Who says you should be able to afford it? There are poor people and rich people in the world. If you cannot afford something then you DON'T BUY IT!

Why the heck should a developer waste his time=money to create an application that you are basically going to steal with the excuse of "I'm poor so I deserve to have it." An application is NOT a necessity, you are NOT entitled to it. Live without it!

I'm glad I don't live in a communist nation...
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dantonic For This Useful Post:
Posts: 316 | Thanked: 150 times | Joined on May 2006
#47
I also find the thought "I hate company X, so I'll pirate all their software and use it without paying" is disingenuous. If you don't like the company, don't use their software. For everything outside of highly specialised niches, there are other options available.
Use other software, get your friends and family to use other software .. that will start too hurt the company you 'hate'.

Many people are surprised to find that there's not much sympathy for pirates in the FLOSS crowd - it's copyright law that keeps our software open
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jaark For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#48
If someone releases the following: I will buy them- even though they were "free" on Android.

1. Shazaam
2. Shopsavvy
3. An app that will allow voice integration with Google search and Ovi maps.
4. Better photo app
5. VLC optimized for N900- or Coreplayer
6. Hardware based audio EQ
7. Image app that allows edits and special effects

Not even touched games yet, since I want these "basics" first.
 
Posts: 158 | Thanked: 67 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#49
It's true that the GPL, for example, rests on copyright law. But it is also true that the GPL is about sharing, so someone in the FOSS crowd may well be of the seemingly contradictionary opinion that its the right thing to do to violate copyright when it comes to sharing culture to enrich the lives of people who can not afford everything, but that it is the wrong thing to do to use GPL:ed code without sharing the modifications source.

Edit: I don't pirate software. Software piracy hurts FOSS. If it weren't for SW piracy, more people would use FOSS. Regarding music and such, on the other hand, I might be persuaded to believe that legal and moral aren't necessarily always the same thing...

Last edited by mannakiosk; 2009-12-01 at 13:59.
 
Posts: 68 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#50
Originally Posted by dantonic View Post
I'm reading all these comments implying that "poor" people from other countries should have the ability to pirate because they cannot afford to purchase the software...

Putting aside the argument about how affordable apps would be... Who says you should be able to afford it? There are poor people and rich people in the world. If you cannot afford something then you DON'T BUY IT!

Why the heck should a developer waste his time=money to create an application that you are basically going to steal with the excuse of "I'm poor so I deserve to have it." An application is NOT a necessity, you are NOT entitled to it. Live without it!

I'm glad I don't live in a communist nation...
You don't understand the thread at all. Read again.
 
Reply

Tags
illegal activities, pirated software


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:55.