Active Topics

 


Page 19 of 158 « First 91718 19 202129 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
annavp is offline annavp
2009-12-01 , 17:21
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Belgium
#181
Hi,

this is a great discussion. I am personally waiting for the Mfe 2003 support since my employer uses MS Exchange and is not migrating very soon.

When will the new SW update be relieased?

THNX
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-12-01 , 18:01
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#182
Originally Posted by karmax View Post
Hi,

any feedback about the bug 6345?
Check my comment #8, pls.

The N900 is non-provisionable device.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Texrat is offline Texrat
2009-12-01 , 18:24
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#183
Originally Posted by kyle View Post
No, it really would be illegal. A breach of contract. Nokia had to license the technology from Microsoft. If they did this, then their license would be revoked and they would likely get sued.
Civil issue, though, not criminal.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
mikec's Avatar
mikec is offline mikec
2009-12-01 , 18:27
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#184
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
Check my comment #8, pls.

The N900 is non-provisionable device.
Vitaly , the real issue here is Nokia,s use of the name Mail for exchange to describe the product in its advertising. Rightly or wrongly this term has set a very high expectation in the market for capabilitirs for enterprise support, especially for prvious Nokia owners. The N900 clearly does not live up to the MfE labeling
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post:
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-12-01 , 18:38
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#185
Originally Posted by mikec View Post
Vitaly, the real issue here is Nokia,s use of the name Mail for exchange to describe the product in its advertising. Rightly or wrongly this term has set a very high expectation in the market for capabilitirs for enterprise support, especially for prvious Nokia owners. The N900 clearly does not live up to the MfE labeling
Let us live the marketing discussions to the marketing guys. According to my understanding if Exchange supports non-provisionable devices, then the labeling is OK. But again, this is marketing discussion. Let us not to go into this area.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post:
karmax is offline karmax
2009-12-01 , 18:40
Posts: 23 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#186
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
Check my comment #8, pls.

The N900 is non-provisionable device.
Thank you for you reply.

I logged into my account via OWA (Outlook Web Access) and I see the following under the menù "Mobile Devices":

Device: SmartPhone
Last Sync Time
Status: OK
First Sync on: Mon 11/30/2009 7:42 PM
Device ID: "my IMEI number"
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-12-01 , 18:41
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#187
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Civil issue, though, not criminal.
Yep. Just several billions of green coupons.
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-12-01 , 18:43
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#188
Originally Posted by karmax View Post
I logged into my account via OWA (Outlook Web Access) and I see the following under the menù "Mobile Devices":

Device: SmartPhone
Last Sync Time
Status: OK
First Sync on: Mon 11/30/2009 7:42 PM
Device ID: "my IMEI number"
Do you mean you see "my IMEI number"? Not the digits but just this string?
 
mikec's Avatar
mikec is offline mikec
2009-12-01 , 19:07
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#189
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
Check my comment #8, pls.

The N900 is non-provisionable device.
Vitaly

I understand that the N900 is a non-provision-able device. I also understand that the option needs to be set on the server side for MfE to work. But is it possible that even if this setting is not made on the server side, that it could still work if the policies being enforced are relaxed enough.

Or another way to ask the question, does the N900 support any policies at all?
 
kalim13 is offline kalim13
2009-12-01 , 19:08
Posts: 46 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#190
Ok next update.

Managed to download certificate from webmail, transfered the file to the N900 and tried to open it from the file browser.

Unfortunately I hit upon another error

"invalid certificate, unable to install"
 
Reply
Page 19 of 158 « First 91718 19 202129 Last »

Tags
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly!

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top