![]() |
2009-12-03
, 13:00
|
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Mumbai, India
|
#72
|
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 13:11
|
|
Posts: 280 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Switzerland
|
#73
|
Be careful in saying this here cos you cant actually say that you like maemo or n900 here since you are accused of being a fanboy...
Its like going to a U2 concert and being shooshed and bashed if you clap..
The Following User Says Thank You to God For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 13:17
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 266 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#74
|
This whole "it is not a phone thing" charade is ridiculous, as it is just a software issue to implement all phone functions and somewhat implies that the Nokia guys have been lazy. However, I am fine with waiting a while to get the other stuff done. Nokia go.
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 13:17
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Londrina, PR - Brazil
|
#75
|
The Following User Says Thank You to puelocesar For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 13:22
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 266 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#76
|
I think this all is comprehensible.. After all, this is a experimental phone, but some people found it to be so awesome, and created a so big hype, that normal people are buying it thinking it's a final/consumer version and demanding it to be far superior then competition.
That's the effect of misinformation: hell on our Maemo forums :P
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 13:26
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 345 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#77
|
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 14:00
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#78
|
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 14:16
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Londrina, PR - Brazil
|
#79
|
The Following User Says Thank You to puelocesar For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-03
, 14:19
|
Posts: 58 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Hilversum
|
#80
|
@kanishou
Yup - we'll agree to disagree. Yes I am definitely saying that Nokia should not have released the N900 as is. There are serious bugs out there - random calls, microphone problems (apparently due to the Nokia charger supplying 5.3V!), bluetooth problems, contacts dissapearing, devices rebooting randomly and so on. Of course bugs will be around, but I feel Nokia rushed this one out again. These bugs have been reported within days of being released. Don't tell me Nokia's testers didn't spot them, and pushed ahead with the launch.
I am not a developer, nor is my knowledge with Linux vast. However when you say completely new development, my understanding is that the N900 is a continuation of the N700/N800/N810, and that Maemo has been around for years now.
The reason that Nokia need the N900 to redeem itself is because of the shakyness of the N97. Confidence in Nokia's products has been dented, and we look to the N900 to restore that confidence. As you say, the N97 was marketed as the flagship device, but faced criticism over the OS, processor, available RAM, UI, stability and hardware (camera lens cover) - when a device was announced that improved all these issues, it makes sense to see it as being a superior device - and it is. It's early days yet, but I still think that some of the bugs could have been tracked down before launch.
To be honest I don't have an N900 yet, but will still get one regardless. I'm prepared for all of the above bugs, because they all sound fixable via updates (apart from the possible charger fault). However, I think sales will suffer.
Again, has anyone else had these bluetooth issues the poster refers to?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sardaukar For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
bluetooth, fanbois, idiot in noob clothing, noise, nokia n900, ring, screen |
|
Its like going to a U2 concert and being shooshed and bashed if you clap..