Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#31
Originally Posted by ewan View Post
I think it's pretty well established that the 'optification' plan is a grade A ugly hack, so doing something different on the grounds of FHS compliance is eccentric to say the least.
what do you mean?
i referenced the fhs to show that there are certain things (like python) which are expected to be in certain paths. which is why we need the whole optification in the first place

thanks for the links, yerga. i really ought to subscribe to the mailing list(s).

mounting really seems to be the best way to optify python. hopefully it's the only exception, filling up the mount table would not be nice.
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
 
Posts: 47 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Oct 2006
#32
Originally Posted by Rushmore View Post
The thread title alone is just so wrong
Not wrong. The answer is John Cleese.

Last edited by statwrangler; 2009-12-15 at 13:19.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52.