Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#11
Originally Posted by Webbie View Post
VNC server will not happen because it's a bad solution to a problem that is already solved. What you should be doing is using X11 forwarding - although why you would want to run GUI apps on your phone remotely is beyond me.
X forwarding defeats the purpose, which is to get a remote display of your existing X session on your desktop. VNC solves some issues that not even X forwarding resolves yet.

Why should the FM transmitter be disabled while charging?
I believe someone mentioned here on the forums that this was an FCC requirement, due to the cable potentially acting like an antenna?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
Posts: 21 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Alabama
#12
why you would want to run GUI apps on your phone remotely is beyond me
VNC server for me would be nice because I could log into my phone and check email, reply to text messages and answer posts on this forum while at my computer at work. Without ever having to pull my phone out of its holster. VNC is already on the Windows PCs at work and at home.


Samba support by default is a bad idea, because it is not core functionality. This is what the repositories are for.
Samba in the extras repository would be fine with me. Just make it easy for a newbie like me to get it going. Simple sharing within a public folder on the N900 and let file manager browse the Windows network.

Originally Posted by mlpmail View Post
FM Transmitter works when charging, just not when connected to USB devices. My transmitter works with the included AC adapter and with my 12v adapter.
What brand 12v adapter is it? My generic brand will not let me use the FM transmitter while it is plugged in.

I believe someone mentioned here on the forums that this was an FCC requirement, due to the cable potentially acting like an antenna?
Sounds reasonable. I wonder if any of the European firmware versions have this limitation?
 
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#13
Originally Posted by hitec View Post
What brand 12v adapter is it? My generic brand will not let me use the FM transmitter while it is plugged in.
i wireless Micro USB VPA Model BEV9PI SKU 41260 34496
$9.99 at Ralph's Grocery.

I Have Two of them and they both work, sometimes I have to plug and unplug USB to get charging started, but once charging I can use FM transmitter. I could not get thru a whole days use with out them.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mlpmail For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#14
Originally Posted by Webbie View Post
VNC server will not happen because it's a bad solution to a problem that is already solved. What you should be doing is using X11 forwarding[..]
Nobody uses X11 forwarding anymore, it's disabled by default in any modern X server. It's a security risk. If you are thinking of X11 forwarding via SSH, yes, that works (in general, I haven't tested on the N900), and is mostly OK security-wise. However, it's very inefficient as soon as there is any kind of latency on the connection. VNC is vastly more efficient because it enhances the protocol itself instead of just compressing it (which is the best SSH can do). Some stuff I start remotely from my desktop takes 10 minutes to come up, over compressed SSH, while with VNC there's no appreciable delay.

So, VNC will happen.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to TA-t3 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 21 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on May 2009
#15
Originally Posted by TA-t3 View Post
Nobody uses X11 forwarding anymore, it's disabled by default in any modern X server. It's a security risk. If you are thinking of X11 forwarding via SSH, yes, that works (in general, I haven't tested on the N900), and is mostly OK security-wise. However, it's very inefficient as soon as there is any kind of latency on the connection. VNC is vastly more efficient because it enhances the protocol itself instead of just compressing it (which is the best SSH can do). Some stuff I start remotely from my desktop takes 10 minutes to come up, over compressed SSH, while with VNC there's no appreciable delay.

So, VNC will happen.
+1 Yep, what he said. X11 forwarding is great for some things, but it's definitely not categorically better, even if performance wasn't a concern. Someone in another thread pointed out that if you lose the connection with X11 forwarding your running application goes kaput with the rest of your ssh session, wheras with vnc it could still be hanging out on your n900.
 
volt's Avatar
Posts: 1,309 | Thanked: 1,187 times | Joined on Nov 2008
#16
I think VNC will happen, mostly based on the fact that x11vnc is already installed on my N900. This fella here gives a reason why you'd want it: to be able to use a mouse.

Last edited by volt; 2009-12-17 at 15:21.
 
volt's Avatar
Posts: 1,309 | Thanked: 1,187 times | Joined on Nov 2008
#17
Originally Posted by Webbie View Post
Samba support by default is a bad idea, because it is not core functionality. This is what the repositories are for.
I agree that setting up a inphone server share by default probably is a bad idea unless done in a thought through manner.

However, access to network shares in the file browsers and applications is per default missing, and this surprised me. That is why the lack of Samba in the repositories is a bit disappointing.

So, client support yes please, server support isn't as important.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53.