Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 27 | Thanked: 55 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ By the swamp
#21
The short version: because buying one got me exactly what I wanted.

A bit longer version: the fruit themed gadgets make the user feel like an idiot (because of the ridiculous amount of pampering "we know what is good for you, we know all your needs"-rubbish and artificial limitations), Google's watchful eye has no business getting to my bedroom (but my communication device has, which is why the two cannot exist in the same entity) and my Windows allergy has been getting worse all the time, so the options were spread rather thin... Blackberries are almost impossible to get here, I might have ended up with a Storm, but then again the 5800 XM felt so cozy all the time I had it that it had to be a Nokia. And it so happens that Nokia has one device in its portfolio that I needed: the most open phone/MID/tablet/mobile computer on the market, the N900. I love it more day by day.
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#22
I got the N900 because I wanted a faster n800 with a hard keyboard.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...

Last edited by Laughing Man; 2009-12-15 at 23:48.
 
Posts: 377 | Thanked: 97 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ US
#23
I got mine because... well, because I can.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to That One Guy For This Useful Post:
Posts: 486 | Thanked: 154 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ New York City
#24
I switched from the iPhone, simply because I'm tired of Apple's tight fisted platform. Sure their hardware is nice and even the operating system is based on a stripped down of OS X which is just a XNU kernel + BSD.
The problem though, really that finally drove me away was their draconian approval process. the iPhone is the antithesis of what is open and free and reminds me of how Verizon and other carriers were back in the late 90s/early 00s - very controlling in what they would let onto their platforms (anyone remember BREW?). Funny how both Sprint and Verizon (with the Palm Pre and Droid) are now more open than Apple/ATT.

Oh and the other reason I migrated to the N900 is the awesome hardware specs.
I still miss a handful of apps that I used to use on the iphone, but I am content to do with out them, rather than sacrifice my principles.

I don't think the N900 and Maemo is quite mature enough, though I think it will get there eventually - maybe in 2 years time (I think more than one manufacturer needs to produce Maemo devices for this to be really viable though).

But for now I'm along for the (imperfect) ride.

Last edited by hypnotik; 2009-12-16 at 00:10. Reason: damn typos
 
digittante's Avatar
Posts: 133 | Thanked: 128 times | Joined on May 2009
#25
Because:
  1. The N810 had no phone
  2. I'd exhausted the possibilities of WinMo hacking/flashing
  3. I wanted the newest/fastest hardware available with a slide-out QWERTY
__________________
================================================
Joined TMO in February, 2009 with an N810. I'm not a dev.
I'm just an active user who blogs about my N900 sometimes.

Happy to field questions where I can help.
================================================
 
skalogre's Avatar
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#26
Originally Posted by Diavoli View Post
I got an N900 so I can make fun of people with their Iphone's.
ROTFL. Good one.

Anyway, it's easiest if I just quote the appropriate posts. So, for me:

Originally Posted by TheLongshot View Post
I got it because I wanted a portable computer that I could take anywhere and that could also take calls.

Really, a cell phone is somewhat secondary for me because I can't take it in where I work anyways, so I wanted it as a secondary function to another device. I'll probably use my N900 more as a computer than I will as a cell phone.
Agree. I hardly use my phones as phones - much more data and SMS use so this little beast is perfect for me.

Originally Posted by mikec View Post
Wanted something to browse this Forum all day on. Cant think of a better mobile browser at the moment.
Guilty!

Originally Posted by That One Guy View Post
I got mine because... well, because I can.
Had a bunch of GC on my Amazon.com account and, well, it works better for me than my N97 which I'll sell at some point soon (even if the N97 is a better smartphone ).
 
Posts: 189 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#27
i've had a "dumb" phone for the past 5 years. I've been holding out for the smart phone that met all of my requirments:
1. Qwerty keyboard
2. Touchscreen
3. Ability to run emulators
4. Ability to run most if not all of my media without the need to transcode to a different format
5. GPS
6. A fairly modern processor

I was very tempted by a few of the android phones as they met most of my requirements but I decided to hold out and now I have the device that I want. If i HAD to complain about the n900 i think the only thing could say is I wish it came with a Snapdragon chipset, but i'm more than satisfied with my purchase. Give the developer community some time and i'm sure we'll have more than enough apps to handle anything most users will need.
 
christexaport's Avatar
Posts: 1,589 | Thanked: 720 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Arlington (DFW), Texas
#28
Originally Posted by hypnotik View Post
I don't think the N900 and Maemo is quite mature enough, though I think it will get there eventually - maybe in 2 years time (I think more than one manufacturer needs to produce Maemo devices for this to be really viable though).
It worked well for S60 all those years, and is working for Apple and RIM so far. More would help, though...

I got the N900 because I've dreamed of having a pocketable laptop until I tried the OQO. Then I knew we'd need a custom UI to make it a reality. The full Linux OS, free open source alternatives to popular software, always on connectivity, open platform access for developers, and a great camera were all I'd need to make my dreams come true.

Now I'm walking around with a finger controlled pocketable workstation, and I couldn't be happier.
__________________
Maemo-Freak.com
"...and the Freaks shall inherit the Earth."
 
Posts: 486 | Thanked: 154 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ New York City
#29
Originally Posted by christexaport View Post
It worked well for S60 all those years, and is working for Apple and RIM so far. More would help, though...

I got the N900 because I've dreamed of having a pocketable laptop until I tried the OQO. Then I knew we'd need a custom UI to make it a reality. The full Linux OS, free open source alternatives to popular software, always on connectivity, open platform access for developers, and a great camera were all I'd need to make my dreams come true.

Now I'm walking around with a finger controlled pocketable workstation, and I couldn't be happier.
Nokia Marketing is hardly comparable to Apple's Marketing Machine.
People were queueing up for days to buy an unsubsidized phone when the first iphone was released. I see nothing of the sort with the N900 launch (not to mention Nokia royally bungled the release to begin with).
 
Posts: 1,427 | Thanked: 2,077 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Sydney
#30
I got the N900 as it's the most geeky phone you can get right now. =P

Also:
1. Browse web just like PC
2. Watch videos without transcoding
3. No need to hack / crack it
4. Hardware keyboard
5. Awesome LCD
6. Resistive touch - I use my finger nails often
7. Good open source developer community right here
8. Possibility to maybe learn some basic linux

Basically, I wanted a mini-pc+phone in my pocket. Seems only N900 fits this criteria.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jakiman For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
none of, your business


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55.