|
2009-12-16
, 16:46
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#532
|
|
2009-12-16
, 19:16
|
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Gouda, Netherlands
|
#533
|
After sw. update, this bug will not happen anymore and no additional steps (symbolic linking) will be needed to import certificate.
|
2009-12-17
, 03:25
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#534
|
|
2009-12-17
, 09:44
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#535
|
I have noticed pictures from N900 address book is not synced back to exchange. Is there a way to make that work?
|
2009-12-17
, 12:10
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#536
|
12.1 protocol (Exchange update is needed). Or wait for N900 MfE client update. I am really sorry about this bug.
The keywords to detect it:
MS-ASProtocolVersions: 1.0,2.0,2.1,2.5,12.0
AS-LIB: Created factory for version 2.5
After client update (w/o server update) you will see:
MS-ASProtocolVersions: 1.0,2.0,2.1,2.5,12.0
AS-LIB: Created factory for version 12.0
After Exchange update you will see:
MS-ASProtocolVersions: 1.0,2.0,2.1,2.5,12.0,12.1
AS-LIB: Created factory for version 12.1
|
2009-12-17
, 12:26
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#537
|
|
2009-12-17
, 12:56
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#538
|
|
2009-12-17
, 12:59
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#539
|
Hi.
Thanks for replying. I wonder. Why mfe 2007 works on N900 for some but it doesn't for some others. What is the reasons. Is that because of cerf. or something else?
|
2009-12-17
, 13:05
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#540
|
Tags |
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly! |
|
Last edited by egrims; 2009-12-16 at 16:43.