![]() |
2007-04-07
, 15:07
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#82
|
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 15:15
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#83
|
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 16:21
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#84
|
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 16:39
|
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#85
|
If either of you would like a free tutorial on shutting up, just reply to this message and I'll show you how I do it...
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 16:49
|
|
Posts: 229 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on May 2006
|
#86
|
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 17:02
|
|
Posts: 531 |
Thanked: 79 times |
Joined on Oct 2006
@ This side of insane, that side of genius
|
#87
|
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 18:15
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#88
|
-but isn't the real reason that skype (and gizmo and gtalk voice) are not open and hackable is so you can't hack it to make free phone calls round the world, 24/7?
I for one can feel the big-money pressure of phone companies riding the partially-stillborn voip wave- at least here in fubar USA. 'wouldn't wan't folks to make free phone calls, ya'know.
dcarter
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 18:34
|
|
Posts: 229 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on May 2006
|
#89
|
![]() |
2007-04-07
, 19:27
|
|
Posts: 344 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#90
|
Minor tidbits of news though this all is, you have still violated your NDA which is the point I'm making and you're too much of a coward to accept it. Yes, coward - you know you've done it and refuse to acknowledge it, hence this tiresome and long running discussion (which ends here although I'm sure you'll continue your rantings).
I don't work in concert with anyone, it's just that you are the attention seeking ego maniac who posts what little information he knows despite being asked not to by those who provided that information (the whole point of the NDA, you see?) You become violently disagreeable when challenged over the most minor of points and if anyone has posted agreeing with my point of view, it's because fundamentally you are an unstable attention seeker and everyone can see this.
If I've chased anyone away from this forum, it's because I speak my mind and question the charlatans that have occasionally turned up here, and this includes you. The only person where I recall this happening is the guy who offered the case for sale but produced no goods or evidence of any goods - as I recall, you defended him. You mug.
Until this post I haven't even come close to being rude to you - some mocking posts maybe, it really is too difficult to pass up sometimes - but you have continually peppered your posts (and not just when addressing me) with offensive references. I find it pathetic that you can't bring yourself to use the real words so please, go right ahead and contact ReggieS. Or is this just another empty threat, because you are after all a classic internet bully?