![]() |
2009-12-23
, 14:20
|
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 111 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Manchester
|
#22
|
![]() |
2009-12-23
, 14:54
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#23
|
Nokia has invested a lot in Ovi Maps. While it has lot of potential, it's not perfect. However, instead of trying to find an alternative product, why not give some suggestions on how it could be improved?
Please put only one idea per solution, this way each idea can be voted separately.
Brainstorm Link
Based on the amount of votes, I created a new brainstorm just for Turn by Turn Navigation.
![]() |
2009-12-23
, 17:08
|
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Nashville, TN
|
#24
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jsuggs For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-24
, 20:38
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 325 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#25
|
OK, I made a new brainstorm for Turn by Turn Navigation. Here is the Talk Link and Brainstorm Link. Please vote for the proposal.
Well, now put yourself in the position of Ovi Maps. Imagine that one of the 15 proposals is due next week and the other 14 are not even roadmapped. Should we resolve "Implemented" selecting only the one solution or should we leave the item open until, say 7 of the 15 eally different proposals are implemented?
In the meantime, imagine that Feature X proposed in Solution N is not implemented by Ovi Maps yet but there are several alternatives that implement it very well. Do we need to keep that part open because the solutions need to be around Ovi Maps or would users be happy just by getting the features from anybody now?
I believe some of the most voted "solutions" would deserve a brainstorm in its own. Turn by turn navigation is a good example.
![]() |
2009-12-24
, 20:57
|
Posts: 151 |
Thanked: 77 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#26
|
![]() |
2009-12-24
, 22:24
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#27
|
![]() |
2009-12-28
, 07:45
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto, Canada
|
#28
|
The Following User Says Thank You to canabal For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-28
, 08:33
|
|
Posts: 138 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Vancouver Island, Canada
|
#29
|
All these votes for specific things are not really helping now, the only thing they should do is make ovi maps on the N900 just as good as ovi maps 3.0. Thats jut the goal
and about revenue thats also simple, just do the same thing as on S60, i had a 3 year contract there. including sub contracts like City explorer. So they made money from me. And i would do the same for the N900 but they have to improve it because what we have no is just so bad...
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bgrigor For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 17:48
|
Posts: 44 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ San Francisco
|
#30
|
I never remember where the restaurant is that I read a review about is located. If I could read the review, add then a point on the map so when I turn on my GPS when I am in the area - voila there it is.
Maybe a proximity alarm too
+1 for landmark