OrangeBox
|
2009-12-24
, 22:57
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#11
|
|
2009-12-24
, 22:58
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#12
|
|
2009-12-24
, 22:59
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#13
|
|
2009-12-24
, 23:03
|
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ USA
|
#14
|
|
2009-12-24
, 23:05
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#15
|
I must say I can take pictures with one hand, its not exactly easy due to the weight of the N900. When I hold it in one hand I naturally have my thumb on the back so it can't slide.
I agree on the quality but it really REALLY is a tiny lens and a lot of people use MUCH worse quality and happily upload them to their blogs, flickr, etc. Sure I wish it could compete to a low-end P&S but its just not realistic, it would have to be a lot bigger and cost a fortune.
|
2009-12-24
, 23:08
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#16
|
The N900 has a 6 out of 10 rating on my scale for indoor pictures. Most pictures I took ended up being fuzzy, overcompressed and grainy. At least red eye didn't seem to be a problem. Taking pictures with one hand is near impossible, because the slider either pops open ifI support the phone from the bottom with my thumb or if I support it from the back, the touch screen gets pushed.
Of course I knew that I should't expect more from the N900 in the camera department, I just wanted to inform people who would want to know the real thing and not sugar coated reviews: don't expect too much from the N900's camera.
|
2009-12-24
, 23:11
|
|
Posts: 294 |
Thanked: 174 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#17
|
|
2009-12-24
, 23:16
|
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ USA
|
#18
|
|
2009-12-24
, 23:19
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#19
|
|
2009-12-24
, 23:20
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#20
|
Tags |
n900 sux as x-mas camera |
|