Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 367 | Thanked: 176 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#11
Originally Posted by poquifox View Post
The n900


N97


Just one word n900 have better quality very very good, n97 sucks
Video recording is indeed superior on the N900. However, this doesn't demonstrate anything about the still image quality.
 
Posts: 41 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#12
Originally Posted by c0rt3x View Post
Video recording is indeed superior on the N900. However, this doesn't demonstrate anything about the still image quality.
yes it demostrated because 600 Mhz gives better performance at the camera logical??? no??

And better hardware on n900 is one point more to the camera performance

600 mhz camera run great. N97 Still slow
Dont believe me check this out?

http://mynokiablog.com/2009/12/12/lo...sus-nokia-n82/

# Camera interface is just so much easier to use!
# 16:9 photo option
# N900 remembers last saved photo settings
# N900 low light without flash is better than N97/N82
# N900 colours/white balance usually more accurate than N97
# N900 doesn’t have the camera glass fault that some N97s do mucking up the photos when
# N900 video absolutely superior with initial autofocus
# Framing subjects much nicer on N900 with large, high res screen

N900 win

Last edited by poquifox; 2009-12-31 at 21:22.
 
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#13
Baaah!

The G1 takes waaay better pictures as anyone that saw my "Three 900's" thread. I am talking studio quality

I am kidding of course. G1 is like a kiddie toy phone in comparison.
 
Posts: 296 | Thanked: 126 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ New York City
#14
These pictures just make me wish N900 had the N97 slider and d pad :-/

The chrome accent on the N900 interfering with pictures is more alarming to me than any other phones capabilities.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38.