![]() |
2010-01-13
, 01:39
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#82
|
I suppose.
DRM has never stopped anyone from pirating anything, not for long anyways. If the post-install script only pointed to some remote authentication procedure, then modifying it wouldn't help the user much. Especially if the remote procedure is encrypted some how.
Anyways, we could go back and forth all day, someone undoubtedly responding with "encryption algorithm would get spoofed" or the like. My original point was that there are ways of providing some degree of protection for proprietary developers.
I wonder how Penumbra and friends are solving this "dilemma"
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 01:44
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#83
|
spoofed" or the like. My original point was that there are ways of providing some degree of protection for proprietary developers.
The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 01:59
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#84
|
The Following User Says Thank You to t7g For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 02:42
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London, UK
|
#85
|
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 02:51
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#86
|
I Locking against IMEI will just be overridden with LD_PRELOAD=fake_imei.so ./game
The store purchase for the 90ish% of non-technical people who don't forums or know the cmdline and just want to pay for great software, should be adequate to make money from honesty and the vague security by obscurity.
The fact it was removed worries me that they didn't know! I'd hate to not have any commercial apps after this untl they tie some amazingly complex kernal blob which locks you with imei and a non LD overridable system call (or something like that).
On a different note charging $3 to americans but almost double that to brits (£3) is completely evil behaviour.
The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 07:30
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 621 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#87
|
I'm concerned that they quickly removed the .deb. surelythey realised this would happen? It can't be news to them. The deviced has no way to stop you copying files from the filesystem.
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 08:47
|
|
Posts: 516 |
Thanked: 643 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Denmark/Poland
|
#88
|
But there's still some threshold how easy piracy can be and having to write only three words to the terminal clearly exceeds it. That's why the package was removed.
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 08:56
|
Posts: 755 |
Thanked: 406 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ UK
|
#89
|
The only thing that i would argue for is the price difference on the iPhone which is 1$ and for us is 3$. Heh still don't mind is a good push for Nokia i guess
The Following User Says Thank You to codeMonkey For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-13
, 08:59
|
Posts: 883 |
Thanked: 980 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Bern, Switzerland
|
#90
|
DRM has never stopped anyone from pirating anything, not for long anyways. If the post-install script only pointed to some remote authentication procedure, then modifying it wouldn't help the user much. Especially if the remote procedure is encrypted some how.
Anyways, we could go back and forth all day, someone undoubtedly responding with "encryption algorithm would get spoofed" or the like. My original point was that there are ways of providing some degree of protection for proprietary developers.
I wonder how Penumbra and friends are solving this "dilemma"
aspidites | blog | aspidites@inbox.com