Reply
Thread Tools
msa's Avatar
Posts: 909 | Thanked: 216 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Bremen, Germany
#11
ok, so rootsh is required.

what a lucky guy i am that all the repos are down right now... xD
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#12
You have to install the rootsh package, I think it is. You may have trouble doing that with repositories down, though.
 
msa's Avatar
Posts: 909 | Thanked: 216 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Bremen, Germany
#13
ok, i have rootsh now, sudo gainroot works.

the problem is: what path do i have to enter with dpkg -i?

i put the file on 2 locations.
location 1, as seen from the filemanager, is: Nokia N900/file.deb
location 2, as seen from the filemanager, is: Sdhc1/file.deb

now i tried dpkg -i Nokia N900/file.deb
and i tried dpkg -i Sdhc1/file.deb

also tried dpkg -i media/Sdhc1/file.deb because i read that memory-cards need to have media/ in front of them.

nothing of this works, all i get is "no such file or directory"
 
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#14
Originally Posted by msa View Post
location 1, as seen from the filemanager, is: Nokia N900/file.deb
location 2, as seen from the filemanager, is: Sdhc1/file.deb
Location1 should be /home/user/MyDocs/file.deb
Location2 should be /media/mmc1/file.deb
 
msa's Avatar
Posts: 909 | Thanked: 216 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Bremen, Germany
#15
Originally Posted by Rob1n View Post
Location1 should be /home/user/MyDocs/file.deb
Location2 should be /media/mmc1/file.deb
i just (10 secs ago) figured that out

i just dont understand why the terminal-path is called mmc when the card itself is named sdhc1.

i still have to learn a lot about linux...^^
 
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#16
Originally Posted by msa View Post
i just (10 secs ago) figured that out

i just dont understand why the terminal-path is called mmc when the card itself is named sdhc1.

i still have to learn a lot about linux...^^
The card name (sdhc1) can be changed, and is user-specific. The mount point needs to be fixed though, otherwise it'd be impossible to write apps to access it.
 
msa's Avatar
Posts: 909 | Thanked: 216 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Bremen, Germany
#17
i see the point.
but as "deep" as terminal may be, its still user-controlled. so why not use the names the user has given to devices? internally, it can still work with the fixed names....

whatever, i'll get used to it.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01.