![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:33
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#482
|
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:35
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#483
|
First the nature of Open Source communities is peaceful, we don't make rebellions, if we have problems we try to fix them, people with those intentions are not welcome at least from my side.
As for the maemo6 in the N900, I perfectly understand the situation, but you guys want that Nokia make a promise based in a unfinished product ? Well if I were a manager I would not do that, during the development phase a lot of things can change, even some blocker that prevents maemo6 in the N900 can appear, then Nokia will be lying to the community.
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:38
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#484
|
Conclusion: We do not know if / when the acknowledged bug will be fixed for the N900 or not. This is unacceptable.
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:38
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Brazil
|
#485
|
Below my personal opinion, as a community member:
First the nature of Open Source communities is peaceful, we don't make rebellions, if we have problems we try to fix them, people with those intentions are not welcome at least from my side.
......
I think Nokia already knows that we want maemo6 in the n900, so we should move along and stop the futurology and try to improve what we've now: Maemo5.
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:40
|
Posts: 65 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#486
|
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:40
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ England and USA
|
#487
|
when i bought the n96 i was happy with it for a week then they announced n97 WTF, then when n97 was launched good thing i didnt buy it , cuz who bought n97 got screwed, i was happy that i waited for the n900 before realisin this sh*t now.
The Following User Says Thank You to sgbirch For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:41
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#488
|
I always wonder how the semi-public bugzilla will be viewed by people no used to that sort of development model. I mean, would it be more acceptable to just not have a public bugzilla, not react to bugs and not have contact with some of the actual developers until the next version is out ? 'Cause thats pretty much what the competing platforms do. The 'forumization' of bugzilla is also a good indicator of this.
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:42
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,530 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#489
|
The Following User Says Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-29
, 20:45
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#490
|
![]() |
Tags |
compatibility, future, harmattan, harmattan is for new $$$, maemo, maemo 6, n900, speculation, upgrade |
|
However, depending on your search parameters,
sjgadsby and GeneralA would disagree with your numbers.
However, I think your search does include some they miss, such as ones that are not actually marked "fixed", but in the comments say "being considered for harmattan" and/or have the milestone for Harmattan.
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!