The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to volt For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 20:22
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 60 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#52
|
I actually have a website... without a single article, I admit, whose purpose is to vent about features that should have been in products but aren't. :B
It is possible to be both disgruntled and creative. Actually I think it helps to be disgruntled, or you'd walk through life being happy wearing a leaf.
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 20:28
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#53
|
Actually, on these standard USB chargers, I can easily charge your Sony Ericssons, by changing a tip. Not so, with the N900.
And I'm with the fellas here, I bought it knowing what it was. But not quite convinced, tbh. There were features missing I wished wasn't missing.
The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 20:40
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#54
|
|
2010-02-13
, 20:51
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#55
|
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 20:54
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#56
|
Yes, it did. However, my N810 charger is in rough shape - it bent easily - and I have always used a standard USB wall charger on it. Which does work on the N810 but not N900.
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 21:08
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#57
|
Pertaining the USB port, Quim made one statement saying it was addressed... since then 30+ pages of people stating otherwise. If I were to trust that one Nokia post - of which ZERO have come after that - then I'd be pissed. And that's with research.
</rant>
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 21:17
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 60 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#58
|
To be fair: Quim is not the hardware guy. He looked into this for us and was given certain information, which he echoed here. And this is not in any way excusing anybody, but it very well could be that the USB problem was corrected in production devices, just not the first lot(s). Quim is speaking for someone else when he answers on this and information is obviously filtered, intentionally or otherwise.
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 21:27
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#59
|
To be fair: Quim is not the hardware guy. He looked into this for us and was given certain information, which he echoed here. And this is not in any way excusing anybody, but it very well could be that the USB problem was corrected in production devices, just not the first lot(s). Quim is speaking for someone else when he answers on this and information is obviously filtered, intentionally or otherwise.
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 21:30
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 132 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ New York City
|
#60
|
Some people act as if they've never been disappointed with a purchase in their consumer lives. Some people react totally differently than others.
And since it's around a device that some of you have decided to loathe or love; the reactions seem to forget that you've either been totally happy or totally disappointed around a purchase. Buyer's remorse is real... and the whole thing about "do research" - there's a whole lot of points not covered.
For instance, pertaining provisioning... use Google. You'll find threads that are here... and not much more. Pertaining GPS lock speed... you'll find threads that are here and at Nokia discussions; but not in the documentation or sales part.
Would a company with a product boast about the bad things? Of course not. But hell, some of this "research" that people are pointing to just does not exist. That's not a justification for the tireless posting ad nauseum about the same thing(s) over and over; but there is no place for some of this information online.
![]() |
Tags |
disclose before selling, extremism rules!, flamewar, here be ranting, learn before buying, misery loves company, never blame nokia, provisioning, troll, wgaf |
|
Well, that's not me, and that is also not true. I tried and failed to find information. There's no "very little time" required to find out if every feature you expect is there or not.
The N900 does not support one of the most usual ways to transfer contact information over Bluetooth to a hands free device. It's the closest thing to a standard that isn't officially a standard. That it would not be compatible with my car HU was impossible to find out without buying one and trying it for myself. I had an idea that it might not be, because I have that experience with other products, but there was no amount of searching that could give me the answer unless I started to study ALL the bluetooth protocols to find out which one used to be used to transfer contact information over bluetooth.
Infact, the only answer if it was compatible or not, on the internet, exists on this site. And I wrote it. To myself.
It is plain hogwash to claim that people can only blame themselves for not getting info when they would need to use years of searching to find out about all the standard features in an average smart phone.
There are lots of people coming here, complaining that things they expected weren't there. If they had cause to expect it to be there, I really don't think it's right to tell them to blame themselves.
If 99.9% of all phones on the market has a feature, and one of the most profiled, biggest contenders doesn't, it really isn't unrealistic to expect that this feature would be in the phone.
However, if they just realize that it has no MMS and this is their complaint, then maybe they should have read at least one review.
Also, what not a single pro-N900 person on this forum seems to remember... The customer is always right. There's no requirement to read up on all features before you buy a camera/phone/condom. If a lot of people expect a feature and it's not there, the product is less than optimal.
Last edited by volt; 2010-02-13 at 20:16.