|
2010-02-16
, 12:44
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Bahrain
|
#412
|
The Following User Says Thank You to agogo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-16
, 12:44
|
Posts: 302 |
Thanked: 254 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#413
|
... I can't recall any posts describing what Moblin itself brings to the party.
...
(That is, how is it better apart from adding x86 support?)
|
2010-02-16
, 13:27
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#414
|
A very peculiar side effect that I alluded to in my opening statement is that the Intel/Moblin team is expected to manage the core/kernel development and support of the potentially largest(-shipping) platform of ARM-based mobile devices!
While Nokia's (ex-Maemo) UI+Tools team has no motive for sabotaging usability on non-Nokia devices, Intel OTOH has a glaringly obvious motive in sabotaging Meego's core ARM-support in various ways, including ignoring or late inclusion of ARM-platform patches or favouring x86 in low-level architectural decisions...
|
2010-02-16
, 13:49
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 174 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#415
|
where is the problem with a conversation, which convinced me, that it's a good thing happening at the moment?
you don't have to share my opinion, you don't have discuss with my cat, so where is your problem?
|
2010-02-16
, 13:56
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#416
|
Saying "you had a conversation" without any details at all...is as valuable as me talking to my dog.
|
2010-02-16
, 14:00
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on May 2008
@ Oulu, Finland
|
#417
|
Yes, they said that Meego will support multiple hardware platforms and that just simply has to include ARM considering that they basicly listed every possible kind of mobile device from phones to in vehicle devices.
EDIT:
From Ari Jaaksi's blog:
Itll run on X86 and on Arm based hardware.
|
2010-02-16
, 14:06
|
Posts: 302 |
Thanked: 254 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#418
|
That is why it is a good thing that MeeGo is Free Software. They can't hide their changes from other interested parties.
|
2010-02-16
, 14:17
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 174 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#419
|
maybe I WAS talking with your dog^^
but that doesn't matter, I never said with whom I had this conversation. Also I never gave any relevant details of meego or the maemo future. So?
The point of my post was to state, that after knowing more facts about meego, I'm more confident, that this is a good thing for the maemo community.
|
2010-02-16
, 14:20
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#420
|
Sure, there could always be an alternative or community-based "MerGo" distribution or few, but the Intel/Moblin team is still in charge of the official, supported MeeGo platform.
Just yesterday I came across a new-fangled edition of Android which was released by some enterprising pseudonym-using russian hacker. Some XDA-based hackers/crackers (no disrespect intended) will load it no questions asked, as will a few unwashed newbies, but personally I'd be very wary/aware of potential foul play.
Same uncertainty principle will apply to most unsupervised variations on the MeeGo theme, meaning that the Intel/Moblin team as managers of the platform core will still wield major control on the ARM side support and development of MeeGo.
Tags |
let maemo live!, maemo vs. moblin war, rpm vs. deb war |
|
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...371#post529371