|
2010-02-17
, 07:14
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#72
|
|
2010-02-17
, 07:21
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#73
|
I'm really feeling split on this. I'm no big fan of either systems. For me the ideal binary based system has always been slackware.
|
2010-02-17
, 07:24
|
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#74
|
What reasons did Intel have, when they decided to use fedora base instead of debian?
|
2010-02-17
, 08:24
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 181 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Universe,LocalCluster.MilkyWay.Sol.Earth.Europe.Slovenia.Ljubljana
|
#75
|
I like Slackware too but I think it is impossible to have a source-based distribution for phone devices yet.
And slapt-get is a yesterday (as apt-get, actually). If you have experience to live with YaST2 level of service it is VERY difficult to return back to outdated (although powerful) apt-get.
Of course, HAM interface is a little better but buggy and not so powerful...
The Following User Says Thank You to ruskie For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-17
, 11:55
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 412 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#76
|
In the meantime, everybody can brush-up on their OBS Debian packaging skills.
|
2010-02-17
, 12:20
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#77
|
What reasons did Intel have, when they decided to use fedora base instead of debian?
Hohndel was quoted as saying that the move to Fedora was largely a "technical decision based on the desire to adopt RPM (Red Hat Package Manager) for package management" instead of Ubuntu's Debian DEB extension. RPM offers the advantage of containing license information, Hohndel was said to have noted, thereby enabling developers to create collections of software by license type or exclude software by license type.
According to The Register,, the switch to Fedora is also occurring because Moblin has "failed to generate much interest" among developers. "Moblin one wasn't successful in creating this community push," Hohndel was quoted as saying. "Having a vibrant community push is the winning factor."
|
2010-02-17
, 12:30
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#78
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-17
, 12:42
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 412 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#79
|
well...
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS2068665492.html
|
2010-02-17
, 12:55
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#80
|
Tags |
rabble-rousing, rpm vs. deb war, rpmligion vs debligion, vote attila77 |
|
Frankly what I would love to see is more community distros for such devices. So if MeeGo will open it all up so that anyone will be able to grab the sources and roll their own any way they please then please please do so.
Let it be completly and fully open then we actually don't have to worry what one is using.
I'm not really happy with the way Maemo runs and I never really could understand Debian or Fedora or Suse(and how many probs I've had with Yast is just to damn weird).
I used to run Slackware until I switched to Source Mage and became a Source Mage dev.
But I started with RH3-something, Caldera, never could get Debian installed back then, Mandrake, a few others(and BSDs) but ended up with Slackware.
So I've experienced a few things. Slackware now-a-days with slapt-get is actually nice. And I thought one could use apt-get with rpm now-a-days? Wasn't there some work on that???
As said at the start my main hope for this is an ability to roll a completly own distro so if someone wants to they could run gentoo or slackware on it with the sources for the relevant packages and not have to rely on any specific vendor provided packges.
For any repos or anything else I might have working on my N900 see:
http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Ruskie
A quick list of what I have in the repos
zsh|xmms2|fcron|gtar|gcoreutils