![]() |
2010-02-17
, 22:18
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#141
|
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 22:38
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#142
|
Yes that's exactly the problem. The support of the older devices stops as soon there's a new one. So having the option to upgrade to the new OS, even without the cool new hardware stuff, is guaranteeing you continuous support not only for the device but for the third party application that also stop releasing updates for the older OSs.
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 22:48
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#143
|
Technically we could have an easy-fedora or easy-mandriva on our Maemo systems if they have the right packages compiled for ARM.
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 22:49
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#144
|
Yes and no: in case of RPM there is a chance that Nokia choses a different policy. Because of restrictive RPMs
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 22:50
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#145
|
Well then you need to be clear about what you want. You want continuous support for the lifespan of your device. You can't expect a new OS to limit itself to the confines of older devices. For example, we have all seen the problems on the N900 caused by having such a small root partition. I can almost assure you that the next Nokia Linux device will not have that problem. That means that the OS will be able to have a lot more stuff on / without having to hack an optification solution. The result of that is that the next OS, whether it is MeeGo or Maemo 6 will likely not fit on the N900's tiny root partition. Forcing MeeGo (or any future Nokia OS) to restrict itself to the confines of the N900 is frankly unreasonable, in my opinion.
However, demanding full support for the lifespan of the device is perfectly reasonable. But then the question is, what is the expected lifespan of the N900? Unfortunately, I don't think that is written any where. And that is something we as a community should demand to know.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 23:11
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#146
|
Well then you need to be clear about what you want. You want continuous support for the lifespan of your device. You can't expect a new OS to limit itself to the confines of older devices. For example, we have all seen the problems on the N900 caused by having such a small root partition. I can almost assure you that the next Nokia Linux device will not have that problem. That means that the OS will be able to have a lot more stuff on / without having to hack an optification solution. The result of that is that the next OS, whether it is MeeGo or Maemo 6 will likely not fit on the N900's tiny root partition. Forcing MeeGo (or any future Nokia OS) to restrict itself to the confines of the N900 is frankly unreasonable, in my opinion.
However, demanding full support for the lifespan of the device is perfectly reasonable. But then the question is, what is the expected lifespan of the N900? Unfortunately, I don't think that is written any where. And that is something we as a community should demand to know.
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 23:18
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#147
|
![]() |
2010-02-17
, 23:53
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#148
|
Like I said, I'm not asking for the OS to limit itself or stop adding new features. But it can be made available on older hardware with some workarounds, or even dropping features that require additional hardware.
![]() |
2010-02-18
, 02:18
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#149
|
One radical difference is a switch from GTK+ to Qt... this will cause a huge drop in developer headcount.
![]() |
2010-02-18
, 03:20
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#150
|
![]() |
Tags |
rabble-rousing, rpm vs. deb war, rpmligion vs debligion, vote attila77 |
|