|
2010-02-23
, 12:15
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 325 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#162
|
Updated: http://wiki.maemo.org/Karma#Weights
Products, applications in Maemo Downloads: 7 * (1 + stars per application
|
2010-02-23
, 12:24
|
|
Posts: 381 |
Thanked: 847 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Helsinki
|
#163
|
On Products, wasn't the amount of votes supposed to have some effect? According to the wiki, it doesn't
I think also voting for a bug in Bugzilla should increase karma. After all, if a bug doesn't get any votes, it would appear as the bug doesn't exist. On the other hand, if there are several votes for it, a fix might come sooner.
And finally Discussion. For some strange reason I have no karma for it, although I have posted few times in maemo-developers. Not much, but it should show something anyway, no?
|
2010-02-23
, 13:49
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#164
|
PS.I'm starting to agree with direct numbers for each category, no more formulas
|
2010-02-23
, 14:52
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 325 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#165
|
See ! While my post was primarily tongue-in-cheek (I hope people realized that at least at the Gross Community Product mention ), the bottom line is that different areas of the community are developing/changing at different paces, which will invariably lead to karma disrepancy after a while, even if we get the formulas right initially. Also, as we progress, sqrt will serve us less and less - because it will become clear even without looking that the high scorers will be those that are active in an area that is non-sqrt influenced.
|
2010-02-25
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#166
|
|
2010-02-25
, 14:34
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#167
|
|
2010-02-25
, 15:58
|
Posts: 263 |
Thanked: 679 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Lyon, France
|
#168
|
BUMP!!
Can we have the numbers a bit more balanced before the council elections ?
The blogs karma is a bit off
The Following User Says Thank You to dneary For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-25
, 16:06
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#169
|
Hi VDVsx,
May I ask: why?
Are there people under 100 karma who you think want to be candidates, who don't have enough karma and who should?
Or people over 100 karma who you don't want to be elligible to run?
Or people over 10 karma who shouldn't have a vote? Or under 10 karma who should?
Because if the answer to all those questions is no, why do anything which would only reorder the first 4 or 5 pages of rankings? And why must it be done before the elections?
Cheers,
Dave.
|
2010-02-25
, 20:40
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 325 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#170
|
Ok, we clearly need to address the bug reports karma and blogs karma, the current situation is very unfair IMHO.
I'm for something similar to the old formula for bugs reports(4*#bugs), perhaps 2*#bugs to balance things a bit more ?
For blog, what about 2*sqrt(current_value) ? Or something similar ?
Opinions ?
PS.I'm starting to agree with direct numbers for each category, no more formulas
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org