Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 12 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jun 2007
#11
i haven't said anything about performance. but the possibility to do that.

the only thing a found about qemu and n800 is that n800 runs under qemu in pc. so i dunno.

i do not own a n800 myself. i'm just planing to buy one

also a happy thing would be to run arm pocketpc apps on n800 with wine or something...
http://www.kerneltraffic.org/wine/wn20040305_213.html#3
 
Posts: 245 | Thanked: 25 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#12
Oh, don't get me wrong, it is a cool idea!
 
Posts: 23 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#13
I've tried, QEMU won't compile. It gives an unknown cpu error. There is support for some ARM cpus as a host but there is no backend for the specific n800 cpu. Porting QEMU to a different cpu is a little out of my experience.

SD
 
Posts: 474 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#14
Getting QEMU on the N800 would be hard, but not too bad.

QEMU is quite slow. Even slower than you think. Remember that we're going from x86 to ARM here, not x86 to x86.

Not to mention that it's ARMEL arch, not ARM arch, so all sorts of things won't work right out of the box.

Given how slow Flash 7 is, the idea of this producing a usable Flash 9 is laughable. We're better off betting on the (still nascent) open source flash VMs.
 
Posts: 129 | Thanked: 13 times | Joined on Oct 2005
#15
I got qemu to work on the n800 by gutting the rtc code. I did this to try to get a faster bochs, but I was very wrong. Qemu is much slower than bochs. I was watching the bios screen typed at typewriter speed. I then tried to use the user-mode emulation to run skype for linux. No success there either.
 
zerojay's Avatar
Posts: 2,669 | Thanked: 2,555 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#16
As I said, no no no no no.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:10.