![]() |
2010-03-08
, 20:56
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 974 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#32
|
Then it's probably best that you cease your participation on bugs.maemo.org.
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 21:04
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#33
|
So you want to get your bug fixed but don't want to even give your email address to the people that will fix your bug? (aka everybody, since this is OSS). What a weird point of view.
Email addresses --you need to share them to allow people to message you. That's how they work.
And this is really a nonissue since getting more addresses is so damn easy (well, spam and spambots is another story and the reason one might hide them from the open internet)... Facebook didn't get in trouble because of this.
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 21:04
|
|
Posts: 1,391 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#34
|
The Following User Says Thank You to thp For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 21:18
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#35
|
But it is typically not possible for a mailing list user to see all of the members of a list, as mail messages only go to the mailing list address.
I am a bit disturbed by the somewhat flippant responses to this privacy issue. It reminds me of Google's attitude: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12...misses-privacy Just because you don't think that this isn't important doesn't mean that you should dismiss those who think that it is.
I would like to understand why maemo think that they can ignore the DPD, just because it is an upstream bug. The server administrators might want to consider who is responsible for the maemo.org servers and the legal implications thereof. I think you are sorely mistaken if you think that "it's an upstream bug" will hold up in court.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 21:20
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#36
|
Totally missing the point. There was no warning that his email address was going to be made public. If he had known, he could have used a "throwaway" address instead of the one he'd rather have kept private ( or for selective personal use).
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 21:32
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#37
|
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 21:54
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 278 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oregon, USA
|
#38
|
craftyguy, note the emoticon after Andre's statement.
What a horrible world we're in if wry humor is now considered... horrible.
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 22:04
|
|
Posts: 1,111 |
Thanked: 1,985 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Åbo, Finland
|
#39
|
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 22:21
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#40
|
Where I come from, emoticons can be thrown in to 'soften' any blatant stabs at someone. I agree it's horrible. privacy is a serious issue for some people, and discouraging them from being involved because of it is the wrong way to go.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
Email addresses --you need to share them to allow people to message you. That's how they work.
And this is really a nonissue since getting more addresses is so damn easy (well, spam and spambots is another story and the reason one might hide them from the open internet)... Facebook didn't get in trouble because of this.
Last edited by javispedro; 2010-03-08 at 20:53.